Uploaded by PaintEdits
622x497 PNG 195 kBInterested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
No description provided.
Tags
+-SH safe2164901 +-SH artist:pencils1392 +-SH fluttershy257401 +-SH oc942373 +-SH oc:finnina2 +-SH pegasus492585 +-SH pony1592784 +-SH shark3552 +-SH comic:fluttershy's anti-adventures36 +-SH g42017183 +-SH bath3509 +-SH bathing1203 +-SH blushing271773 +-SH cute264496 +-SH everything went better than expected127 +-SH heart75561 +-SH hug37389 +-SH shyabetes19119 +-SH splash490 +-SH swimming pool4151 +-SH water25045
Loading...
Loading...
Wasn’t sure, but he was rather hateful out of no where, so I’m sorry if I assumed as much. I checked out the link with the comic, and the Twitter it was funny, but I was still trying to get to the bottom of things out of curiousity.
Just bored outta my wits here, also my first language isn’t English so maybe I missing something from my language barrier.
Hey, I’m not background pony, but you really should read the link I posted earlier because you’re missing the funniest joke on the whole entire internet.
Wait. What bait?
Which is it? It’s like you’re trying argue with me intellectually while playing yourself off as a troll at the same time. This is some next level mental gymnastics you’re pulling off.
Pick one.
Well I tried, seems you don’t want to be helped though. Guess I’ll just sit back and enjoy some popcorn while you keep taking the bait.
Someone is quite hostile. Is this just Ruise who checked off the anonymous box to vent at me a bit, or someone who just likes to be rude if given the chance? I’ve checked all links given too me. Both have conflicting evidence. The mythbuster video is the most in depth as they actually physically tested and observed under a microscope.
Before you are too quick to assume, you may want to actually give people the benefit of the doubt otherwise… Well how did you put it?
@Background Pony #21C8
You like to read and learn, but not enough to actually click the link apparently. Perhaps you should take a moment to read and learn before you make any more of a fool of yourself.
They bought from the only reputable shark skin seller in the state that it’s legal from.
I’m not sure why you’re so adamant against that evidence. How do you know the skin sample they are using is such a low quality? Why does a low quality/expired skin cause once smooth skin to become course? Have conducted crude experiments yourself with fresh/high quality shark skin, which yielded different results? Are you a marine biologist?
I’m just curious. Covid’s gotten me quarantined from my job and when I am cooped up I like to read and learn.
Edited
Mythbusters used a low quality, expired shark skin. Sharks in the ocean are smooth, no matter which direction you rub them from.
I’ve learned so much :D
Mythbusters - Shark Skin
Mythbusters did a segment on it. Using the shark skin they were able to (somewhat) sharpen a dull blade, when tested on Plexiglas it was consistent with a 400-600 grit sandpaper and it was able to significantly sand wood to a smooth texture.
Sorry to burst your bubble, but unless you have a source that actually tested the skin as such and came up with different results I have to side with the only source that tested it.
according to a comic*
Every shark is completely smooth, no matter what angle you touch it from.
How else?
hue hue hue hue hua
Well I googled it before I made my comment. Perhaps it only applies to certain sharks.
Shark skin
That’s not correct, shark skin is smooth from all angles.
Well I learned something new today. Also makes sense why Kisame’s sword (from Naruto) is literally called “shark skin” and damages people by shaving, instead of cutting.
Maybe a ponies fur offsets this? I dunno!