Uploaded by Background Pony #188C
800x600 JPG 127 kB
Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
No description provided.
You can't edit the tags on this image.
Tags
+-SH safe2175926 +-SH artist:pokehidden914 +-SH pinkie pie256037 +-SH rainbow dash280106 +-SH twilight sparkle358060 +-SH earth pony446960 +-SH pegasus497151 +-SH pony1604150 +-SH unicorn538650 +-SH g42030807 +-SH bed mane887 +-SH cuddle puddle372 +-SH cuddling10752 +-SH cuddling in bed96 +-SH cute265973 +-SH debate in the comments280 +-SH dishevelled330 +-SH featured image1212 +-SH female1804434 +-SH floppy ears73064 +-SH in bed548 +-SH indoors8230 +-SH lesbian117784 +-SH lying down46868 +-SH mare742106 +-SH on back34267 +-SH polyamory7916 +-SH pony pile966 +-SH ship:pinkiedash3684 +-SH ship:twidash5857 +-SH ship:twinkie2334 +-SH shipping254384 +-SH sleeping29395 +-SH smiling397898 +-SH snuggling7420 +-SH tongue out147343 +-SH twidashpie41
Loading...
Loading...
Not horny, just mistaken, way to make assumptions my guy.
I listed them because they’re all things I frequently see tagged with what the artist wanted even if what the image shows would suggest otherwise. Hell there’s even a whole tag specifically for the third example. I often see tag wars and comment arguments on those kinds of images, and every time the mods have chosen the artist’s intent for the tags.
Artist intent in general can be used as a last resort in ambiguous cases, but those are all things that shouldn’t generally need to use it, especially the first one due to its large effect on ratings.
It can often take more than one mod to fix tags, with how unwieldy they can become.
How could he not be horny when looking at three cute girls snuggling their bodies atop each other ;)
Artist intent also matters for: whether an image is considered to be rape, what gender the characters are, what age the characters are, and likely more that I can’t currently think of. On a site like e621 with a true “tag what you see” policy, none of those are up to the artist outside of lore tags.
Edited because: Rule #7: Suggestive
your current filter.Shit I could have sworn I got that from here. Anyway sorry for getting a tag added by making a couple offhand remarks, really not a big deal. It’s a really cute image regardless
Pretty sure those are grooves in the tree trunk of Twilight’s library, which is where they’re sleeping. A sleepover in the Treebrary if you will.
Edited because: Rule #7: Suggestive
@Kalenz
It’s a rather vague implication to be sure, really only relying on hair frizzing (something that at least for Pinkie wouldn’t happen just from being partied out). I think this style of image stems from FiM itself tending to make romance literally just nuzzling, not being allowed to even kiss until the day of the wedding.
That’s not really correct. We just aren’t as strict as e621 with only tagging what’s seen. The main departure is with shipping images, like this one, where technically we don’t know from the image that the three are romantically/sexually involved, but it’s an easy inference to make from knowing the artist.
(Happy to see this featured :D)