> [@Background Pony \#B605](/forums/art/topics/what-images-are-you-getting-sick-of-seeing?post_id=5265984#post_5265984)
> there's a reason people (mostly anti-bronies) used to call bronies horsefuckers back then.
>
> But having seen the object fandom and their sexualization of object characters there, I can sort of understand. It's mostly the emotional and character attachment that usually leads to sexualized fan arts.
> Also a number of them are actually into horses irl.
Furry =/= Beastiality. If Fluttershy was real I doubt most of the brony community (the sane ones) would bang her because she's a real horse. Most bronies that I've talked to do one of two things.
A. They make an OC to screw a character. Not exactly the noblest of intentions but it beats the alternative.
B. They masturbate to horses but not real ones. Yeah I can see why people might find this creepy but trust me when I say the majority of bronies don't actually want to fuck real animals. It's really no different from fapping to Lola Bunny.
I admittedly find EG sexualizations creepier than Pony sexualizations as the characters are younger. Keep in mind the majority of these ponies have maturity of actual humans and are essentially their planet's human equivalent.