What images are you getting sick of seeing? (NSFW ALLOWED)

@Wiimeiser
Then the majority is dumb and don’t know what they’re talking about.

This applies to so many things.

@Skoon
I mean I ain’t judging! You can like all the TwiArmor pics or Applecest pics you want.
I didn’t mean it was pedophilia in the original definition, I meant it was kind of creepy to have Applejack for example who is basically Bloom’s adopted mother since Granny is too old, romantically into the filly she’s basically raised from birth, or rather since her mom died and Granny got too old. Fire Emblem has several issues with this. It’s less weird with RariBelle because Rarity didn’t RAISE Sweetie.
But hey, if you like it I don’t have any issues with it beyond general weirdness. Hence why I don’t have it filtered out.

And if they’re aged up, I don’t really mind. Call it backpedalling if you want but I legit don’t have an issue with aged up Bloom and Applejack.

What images are you sick of seeing thread?

Naw dawg, this is now the Pedoapoligists Thread.

@AwkwardLuna
Really now? Pedoapologists? Liking porn of underage characters does a pedo make you not, my dude. Even less so aged up porn of said characters, Backwards thinking right there.

@Mikey
100% agreed with the aged up part, heck I love adult Sweetie Belle, she’s gorgeous. Just thought it was funny, the turn the thread took.

Plus, “Pedoapologist” is fun to say, even if its awful.

@AwkwardLuna
Ah.

@AwkwardLuna
I love having everything I say invalidated, mislabeled and dismissed, makes me feel great. What a wonderful fandom we have, I am so glad I have spent the majority of the last 11 years making art for it.

It’s always acting so grateful.

@Skoon
If it makes you feel better, I really don’t consider myself part of this fandom, so there you go?

I mean, that’s because the MLP fandom is generally awful so you’re probably technically valid in your feelings just not because of my snark.

@AwkwardLuna
The most awful parts of the fandom consider themselves to be outside of it.

Case in point you, the channers that despise “bronies” for being “too normie”, and the twitter users that despise “bronies” for not being “normie enough”.

Everyone in the middle gets fucked and can’t even see where the blows are coming from.

@AwkwardLuna
I have yet to encounter a fandom that isn’t “generally awful”. The the most we can hope for is finding a general awfulness that falls within one’s own personal tolerance levels.

im tired of fallout 4 creation kit being a buggy mess.

Sick of seeing “base used” images, especially the carrying base (le Thunderland carrying Rares), it breeds more of that images in a bad and misused ways, they sometimes not tagged properly.

Feral breastlestia?

@Soobel
You mean chestbreasts /quadrepedal chest boobs?

@Soobel
Real horses almost have these, and it’s cute

I just had to filter an artist because he just keeps doing and doing pics of Discorded Twilight sad. It gets on my nerves.

Here’s another one: Unbirthing.

No issues with non lethal vore, but unbirthing is gross.

Countless OCs with heterochromia.

That refers to a person with different colored eyes, like one eye being blue and the other being brown.

I can agree there but with the whole subject of “vore,” its such a big-ish problem on here. People will not and won’t learn to tag them correctly or subjectively to what kind it is…for example of it was softcore, hardcore, contained digestion/death, oral vore, anal vore or unbirthing.

Literally the reason to why I hide just the whole tag/subject of it now few months back and I never used to do that, I only had oral vore, hardcore vore, and digestion hidden as I find those types heavily disgusting/disbirbing but sadly too many images containing those themes untagged/badly tagged kept popping up so I gave up and hid all vore-related tags, not like I already hated/disliked seeing the fetish anyway.

@Lil_VampireCJ
Me, I don’t kinkshame. If someone wants to spank the monkey to someone being eaten it’s not my problem. I mainly hide the tags that disgust me most, but honestly I agree with people not tagging images being annoying. For human ponidox if I don’t want to see human RD eating Pony RD and Pony RD calling her mama (those really bad edits which anyone with the circle tool can do in paint, which is why I’m considering filtering out 1000 hours in MS Paint) I shouldn’t have to see that just to see humans interacting with ponies. One time I had to look at a picture of Fluttershy shitting on Angel Bunny because it wasn’t tagged properly.

Oh good heavens, literally the same here…its common sense to not like or natiurally feel disgusted by things. I don’t kinkshame either as long as they keep it respectfully to themselves and don’t force it upon others(aka shove it in ppls faces, specifically ppl who dont like it) then fair enough.

I’m starting to get heavily sick of seeing these 3D anthro models(Certain type in particular) everywhere, they’re heavily overrated and I rly dislike them and the style, there isn’t a exact tag for them either meaning I cannot exactly filter them out at all as they do not have their own subjective tag… is there a tag for it though?

And I do not want to hide “SFM/Source Filmmaker” or “3D” as it hides some of my content & content I like to see…I don’t mind seeing any other SFM/3D stuff…I just hate and am sick of seeing “that” anthro model in particular.

This is a example of what model type/thing I am on about which I am sick of seeing and wish I could hide/had its own tag to filter:

Spoiler Warning for suggestive imagery-
>>2824877

(No hate or anything is targeted towards anyone or any artists who use or like it of course.)

@Lil_VampireCJ
If you know how to use complex filters, you could hide “sfm, anthro”

idrk how to use complex filters as I have never used it before…. atm i decided to hide SFM + “not sfm” as some of the artists who use the model don’t use sfm for their stuff…

I have no clue how to do it, could you please help?