Viewing last 25 versions of post by Barry Tone in topic Automotive enthusiasts?

"[@Flying Pancake":](/dis/automotive-enthusiasts/post/2787879#post_2787879

)
 
I agree.


 
Since the subject of old vs new has come up, here's that 1959 Chevy vs 2009 Chevy video:


 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_r5UJrxcck


 
Both cars were at 35 MPH. The '59 was a survivor car, not pristine but they wanted something with structural integrity. I read it did have an engine in it but had the notorious X frame (though what does that count for against it from the front, really?) and was purchased at $8,500 or something like that.

"@Flying Pancake":/dis/automotive-enthusiasts/post/2787879#post_2787879

I agree.

Since the subject of old vs new has come up, here's that 1959 Chevy vs 2009 Chevy video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_r5UJrxcck

Both cars were at 35 MPH. The '59 was a survivor car, not pristine but they wanted something with structural integrity. I read it did have an engine in it but had the notorious X frame (though what does that count for against it from the front, really?) and was purchased at $8,500 or something like that.

"@Flying Pancake":/dis/automotive-enthusiasts/post/2787879#post_2787879

I agree.

Since the subject of old vs new has come up, here's that 1959 Chevy vs 2009 Chevy video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_r5UJrxcck

Both cars were at 35 MPH. The '59 was a survivor car, not pristine but they wanted something with structural integrity. It did have an engine in it and was purchased at $8,500 or something like that.

"@Flying Pancake":/dis/automotive-enthusiasts/post/2787879#post_2787879

I agree.