@Broken Adam
I dunno? They’re surprisingly just not my thing. I’ve given them a few tries, and while they’re all great instrumentalists, especially the late Dimebag Darrell, part of what it is may just be that I’m not a big fan of Phil Anselmo’s vocal style.
@Broken Adam
More than lyrics, certainly, but as a vocalist myself there are certain singers I can’t help but wince when listening to. (That’s also why I can’t listen to much black metal–it just sounds painful!)
@ILoveMyoozik
Or, if we’re talking pre-’90s Pantera, then it would be glam meta! :P
@Broken Adam
Let’s be real: Critics have never liked Mötley Crüe. That’s the reason they hated The Dirt. Fans loved it, meanwhile; it quickly became the highest audience-rated movie on Rotten Tomatoes.
@Meanlucario
It was. Which is why all the sequels have sucked: they completely missed the point of the first one.
Rambo was an early example of the “non-action film gets turned into an action franchise.”
@ILoveMyoozik Don’t need nothin’ but a good time! How can I resist?
@Hollowfox Jaeger
I think you’re missing the point of what is being said. Also, are you going to give me a quote or two, since for all I know, it could be that Rambo and Rambo’s violence is just badly done and not fun, while John Wick 3’s is well done and enjoyable.
@TheHappySpaceman
Motley Crue got shat on by critics in the mid 80’s because they released two medicore Albums, Dr Feelgood was critically acclaimed, although compared to Def and Bon Jovi they got much more flack from critics
@Broken Adam Too Fast for Love and Shout at the Devil were also panned, though, and those were good albums.
@Hollowfox Jaeger
The original movie had action elements, but it wasn’t glorifying the action. It was about a Vietnam vet who was dealing with PTSD, and about America’s poor treatment of soldiers after the war.