So I just saw this
It’s actually an article from about 7 months ago, but was updated recently. To sum it up, it’s an angry fat guy bitching about how Star Wars ruined Sci-fi, is remissed that many of the slower sci-fi books have never been made into movies, and just general complaining about the industry.
I hate this kind of attitude with a passion, and let me explain why. A lot of the books he mentions, and many of the slower, more thoughtful Sci-Fi works would be fucking ruined in movie form. Yea, there are a lot of books I’d love to see on the silver screen, but I know deep down that there is no fucking way they’d survive the transition. So, we get left with this impotent nerd-rage by people who think that movies, a predominately audio-visual media, has the “gall” to focus on visuals and sound.
Better yet, the little fucker has the nerve to use “space opera” as a derogatory term. If it isn’t some uber-deep, thought provoking piece of pseudo-intellectual tripe, than this guy hates it. Goddess forbid there be any “fun” or “amazment” or “wonder” in sci-fi, nope, needs to be dry, depressing bollocks that “speaks of the human condition. And really, space operas can’t address complex issues? What about Firefly (and by extension Serenity)? Fifth Element? Battlestar Galactica? Andromeda? Guardians of the Galaxy? Farscape? Stargate? Did none of these tackle big issues? Yes, Sci-fi can be used to hurdle a lot of big, intellectual topics. But it can also be about the grandeur of the universe. This is the kind of idiot that reads 1000 different meanings in an Andy Warhol piece with a “lol 2 deep 4 “ smirk, and spits on a Van Gogh for not being highbrow enough.
This guy even had the gall to say that The Matrix was the most original Sci-fi film in 25 years. Really? REALLY?
tl:dr version.
Idiots that think everything has to be “deep” and depressing piss me off. Even more so when these misguided idiots believe that their favorite thing could survive in movie form by the power of fucking fairy dust and fan-boi farts.