I can, actually.
I’m not one to argue that gender is 100% a social construct. Far from it, there are core cognitive and genetic factors that lead to expressed differentiation between cis males and cis females. Such as a noted proclivity of young females to gravitate toward toys and stories that hew close to “tend and befriend” stylings rather that “fight or fight”, even when controlling for things like parenting style and exposure to specific gendered stimuli.
The thing is though, to state that gender has no social component is equally as false. As is to imply that these cog/gen factors are the be-all-end-all for gender.
It should also be noted that it is impossible to raise a child in a vacuum. They will invariably have had some exposure to gendered stimuli, unless somehow tested right out of the womb. In this respect, it becomes a little more difficult to disentangle genetic factors from situational factors. Genetic predispositions clearly exist, in various forms, but their expressions are impacted by situational factors beyond genes. We can see this with the evolution of females in the workforce and military, as females are very much capable of happily filling roles traditionally gendered toward males. Many of those roles assumed far too much of a genetic predisposition, when large portions of those parameters were, in fact, of a social origin.
Cognitive beings of the complexity of humans cannot be easily slotted into either the nature or nurture spheres. Complex systems within human cognition will be influenced by an equally complex web of genetic, epigenetic, situational/environmental, and social stimuli. With considerable overlap.
Do not try and “gotcha” me, it is rarely successful.