Site staff didn’t care about the Atlantic article and called it a hitpiece, and they won’t care about any other articles.
And just because the EU consider cartoon horses children, doesn’t mean that other countries do.
Article 2
Definitions(a) ‘child’ means any person below the age of 18 years;(…)(c) ‘child pornography’ means:(…)(iv) realistic images of a child engaged in sexually explicit conduct or realistic images of the sexual organs of a child, for primarily sexual purposes;
A casual person completely unaware of the situation would look at TSP and be like “oh, you own and run a website that multiple news outlets have talked about harboring a Nazi community? That’s fucked up”
We would only find out if foalcon is considered child porn (or underage anthro) if there were a curt case/precedence.
Are their a victim or actual child abuse within these drawings? if not, then their no case.
How would you react in the following cases:
- you were raped as a child, come to this site and see thousands of pictures portraying rape and childporn (just with anthro creatures: funny ears, large eyes and a tail)
- your grandfather were killed by nazis or something, come to this site and see thousands of pictures portraying “lol nazi stuff is funny”
Or take another example: fully computer generated 100% life like child porn, which is motion captured from adult persons. Does that one have a victim?
You underestimate the cuckery of the EU, I’m afraid Mr.BGP is correct. Loony judges don’t think twice before shitting on the law to appease a twitter mob.
cannot possibly be CP because fictional
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
