Bedroom eyes

The bedroom eyes tag is described as follows:
 
Short description:Eyes partially closed in a seductive manner. Should only be used on suggestive or higher images. For safe images, use lidded eyes instead.
 
A search of bedroom eyes,safe yields 4551 results. I think that advice isn’t working :)

These tags should be aliased.

The tag’s description is wrong. I changed the tag guidelines a while back to remove that insanity of “two characters looking at each other lustily is automatically suggestive”, but never touched the tag (and it had been messed with after an argument over it and tagging on safe that resulted in the “lidded eyes” thing).

Excuse me, but do  
>>1078724  
>>1077644  
>>1098121  
>>1086494  
>>1073335  
>>1065916  
>>1062934  
>>1027317  
>>1020248  
>>991129  
>>979467  
>>973744 (deleted)  
>>953618  
>>947193  
>>941629  
>>943393  
>>934487 (merged)  
>>934588 (deleted)  
>>925855  
>>902373  
>>898405  
>>873595,  
for example, really have the ‘eyes partially closed in a seductive manner’?

Can we PLEASE have a non-bedroom-eyes tag for lidded eyes that are not seductive in the least?
 
Or rename and redefine, bedroom eyes?

@saby  
Looks like someone sneakily unaliased lidded eyes in just the last few hours.
 
Thanks, whichever mod did it! :)

Yeah, working on undoing this nonsense. Bear with me, there’s almost 7000 images to sort.

I’m pleased to see that “lidded eyes” has hundreds of pictures even if excluding the intersection with “bedroom eyes”. The tag re-separation was needed indeed.