Voices
@icicle wicicle 1517,
@Background Pony #EB90,
@Parallel Black
There are the tags
aivo and
avo somebody made which
I think are meant to identify computer-generated voice mimics - my guess is they mean “AI VOice” or “AI VoiceOver” - but so far nobody has commented to confirm, nor have they been merged or set up as implications of anything.
Another situation that I haven’t seen arise yet, but which I’ve thought about, is machine learning generated
backgrounds for drawings. If it comes up, perhaps “machine learning background” to go along with
real life background?
Attribution and filtering
@Princess Celestia
I do not think the names of the image generator software should have
artist:
prefixes. They are tools - we don’t craft tags like
artist:source filmmaker
.
Even so, it wouldn’t be as simple as making a complex filter for machine learning generated, artist:*
because the person who is responsible for the generation of the image may well be tagged with an artist:
tag - AFAIK that’s the convention even for other “non-artistic-meritous” images like con photos and exact-replica screenshot vector traces*.
* please do not interpret this as an insult! I am aware that vectoring is a skillful craft
Merit
@Princess Celestia,
@saby,
@Princess Celestia,
@Parallel Black
Even unedited machine learning generated imagery
can have artistic merit, in any of several ways - through repeated refinement of your text input and settings until you get a result you want (I would compare this to photography, where there is a mix of hands-on influence and selection/curation by a skillful eye), or by using “img2img” functionality where a preliminary crude drawing is input to set up the composition and scene elements.
Value comes from what you put into it. It’s just that it’s new and there are a lot of “near zero effort” posts (eg. screenshots of the Craiyon website)