Report site bugs here

@Trixie1995  
That’s just a template, which is why it isn’t HTML. Look in the page source (this is for me, with the watched tags thing stripped out):
 
    // Set up tag lists for client-side image spoilering/hiding     window.booru.filterID = 56027;     window.booru.filterCanEdit = false;     window.booru.hiddenTagList = \[\];     window.booru.spoileredTagList = \[\];     window.booru.hiddenFilter = window.booru.parseSearch\(""\);     window.booru.spoileredFilter = window.booru.parseSearch\(""\);     window.booru.ignoredTagList = \[\];     window.booru.userID = 291421;     window.booru.userSlug = "liamwhite1";     window.booru.userName = "liamwhite1";     window.booru.userAvatar = "//derpicdn.net/avatars/W1siZiIsIjIwMTUvMTIvMTMvMjNfNTFfMDJfMjA2X012YUxKc3EucG5nIl0sWyJwIiwidGh1bWIiLCIxMjV4MTI1IyJdXQ.png";     window.booru.spoilerType = "static";     window.booru.\_hidden\_tag = "//derpicdn.net/assets/tagblocked-a6790e31ad2d0ec2fdd400aab8ba2eb7177c0489c12525bfda9ef42be933e662.svg";     window.booru.\_interactions = \[\];

@liamwhite1  
Never seen that site before… And all a template. Saves a ton of time I suppose. I see you do somethings clientside. But hey, I still don’t understand it. shrugs I just know to keep the site HTTPS you have to host everything on the site and can’t put links on pages that lead to other pages without a HTTPS certificate too.

@liamwhite1  
>”That’s just a template…”  
Woah, it’s like they factored the majority of the redundancy out of HTML. That’s pretty great. :D

I have a filters user count problem too.  
 
How to get a big number of users:  

@GAlekz  
can confirm this increases user count  
interestingly though, switching away from it multiple times does nothing

@GAlekz  
how to fix

@GAlekz  
Weeee controller not checking that you’re actually on the filter you’re switching off of. I’ll go fix.

@Princess Luna  
hahaha– Yeah, I made some changes to my filters a little while ago and every time I switched from my legacy filter to porn filter and back it thought there was a new user on the legacy.

@TexasUberAlles  
That sounds like a separate issue. I’m not exactly surprised, filter counts just seem to be poorly thought-out in terms of how they update.
 
The issue with switching to a filter you’re already on has been fixed, at least.

@Princess Luna  
I’m still not sure how one person I saw a while ago said their filters managed to read -2 users.

@SuperSupermario24  
Filter user counts have had problems for a long time, and sometimes the problems go in the downwards direction.
 
The problems should be at an end next deploy, as I’ve changed the code for updating the count to use Rails’ thing for “just tell the database whatever it has needs to be incremented/decremented”, and the database should be able to deal with it since it has row-level locking.

Being unable to remove the “exploitable meme” and “meme” tags is intentional, isn’t it?

@kleptomage  

 
… no? What image is this on?

@Clover the Clever  
>>1046503
 
Sullen added the “exploitable meme” and “meme” tags when they don’t apply to that image and when I went to edit the tags out they don’t appear in the box.

Being kicked from a channel in shuo leaves the tab open, and attempting to close it with the button on the tab gives the message ERROR: you are not in that channel.

@Anon In Chains  
Most of our site assistants know that the site isn’t actually responsible for anything Ponychat and know better than to post here when a moderator misunderstands their question.
 
Most.

@Princess Luna  
Screw you nebbie

@Anon In Chains  
@Princess Luna  
@Anon In Chains  
Great things were witnessed here tonight  

Sorry if I’m getting repetitive, but the lack of clientside image scaling is getting really bothersome.
 

 
 
I’m using latest Chrome on OSX 10.9.5
 
Turning off all browser extensions doesn’t change anything. It works just fine in Safari, but I’d really rather keep using Chrome. Is there any way to fix this, either on your end or mine?

@VladimirMacHolzraum  
Are you super-duper sure you have ‘scale large images’ ticked on in your account settings?

@The Smiling Pony  
Yes.
 

 
I’m still getting sever-side scaling (if I open the picture from the example in a new tab it’s still smaller than full size), but I’m not getting the client-side scaling that fits it to my window.
 
Also, I’m sure my browser is at 100% zoom.

@VladimirMacHolzraum  
I see the same thing:
 

@liamwhite1  
And this is what I see when I use Safari:
 

 
It displays the exact same height as the window and even reacts when I change the window size.

@VladimirMacHolzraum  
So this is actually working as intended - it’s a very tall image, and our default assumption on images with such an aspect ratio are probably comics or similar which want to be full-width or at least tall thumbnails. If you look at the image being served, you’ll see something like /img/2015/12/18/1047033/tall.jpeg rather than full.jpeg. In this case, additionally, the clientside scaler will not try and fit the image by height.
 
In the vast majority of cases this is correct; there are some edge cases where this doesn’t work very well, as you’ve noted.

@Clover the Clever  
That makes sense, but I was mostly using that image as an example since it’s more readily apparent what the problem is from a single screenshot. Even images in landscape orientation get cut off if they’re big enough.
 

 
 
And actually, from further experimentation I’ve found that I am getting some client-side scaling, but it only reacts to the width of the window and not the height, whereas on Safari it reacts to both width and height.