Viewing last 25 versions of post by Princess Luna in topic Rule #0 Policy Refinement Feedback Thread

This is to centralize feedback on our current policy refinement. This thread is _*not_* for arguing who is and is not a Nazi, the validity of any DNPs, etc., but only on whether you think the policy is good or bad, and why. We will not hesitate to delete posts trying to get into political arguments with others.

The
 
WIP policy idea is as follows: "Content containing blatant hate speech, or promotion of or propaganda for prejudicial views". It is far from final.

Results of internal polls can be found "here":/forums/meta/topics/results-of-staff-polling-on-borderline-content-and-rule-0

WIP redrafting of Rule 0 based on feedback so far:[bq]
> - Do not post content whose only apparent purpose is inciting anger, arguments, or controversy.

> - Do not harass others or try to incite violence against them. Harassment can include namecalling, slanderous speech, or other forms of abusive language.

> - Do not discriminate on personal characteristics (e.g. race, sex, or religion) or advocate for doing so (such as using a mouthpiece to say racism is good).

> - Criticism is welcome and encouraged when done so in a constructive and helpful manner. However, using baseless, unconstructive criticism as a veil for the purpose of insulting or attacking an image and/or an artist is not allowed.

> - This rule applies to all images, comments, forum posts, and private messages, along with all other interactions you may make on this website.

 
Results of internal polls can be found [here.](/forums/meta/topics/results-of-staff-polling-on-bq]orderline-content-and-rule-0) Please note that these were only used to figure out the wording, and do not indicate whether an image will actually be deleted or not.

This is to centralize feedback on our current policy refinement. This thread is _not_ for arguing who is and is not a Nazi, the validity of any DNPs, etc., but only on whether you think the policy is good or bad, and why. We will not hesitate to delete posts trying to get into political arguments with others.

The WIP policy idea is as follows: "Content containing blatant hate speech, or promotion of or propaganda for prejudicial views". It is far from final.

Results of internal polls can be found "here":/forums/meta/topics/results-of-staff-polling-on-borderline-content-and-rule-0

WIP redrafting of Rule 0 based on feedback so far:[bq]- Do not post content whose only apparent purpose is inciting anger, arguments, or controversy.
- Do not harass others or try to incite violence against them. Harassment can include namecalling, slanderous speech, or other forms of abusive language.
- Do not discriminate on personal characteristics (e.g. race, sex, or religion) or advocate for doing so (such as using a mouthpiece to say racism is good).
- Criticism is welcome and encouraged when done so in a constructive and helpful manner. However, using baseless, unconstructive criticism as a veil for the purpose of insulting or attacking an image and/or an artist is not allowed.
- This rule applies to all images, comments, forum posts, and private messages, along with all other interactions you may make on this website.[/bq]

This is to centralize feedback on our current policy refinement. This thread is _not_ for arguing who is and is not a Nazi, the validity of any DNPs, etc., but only on whether you think the policy is good or bad, and why. We will not hesitate to delete posts trying to get into political arguments with others.

The WIP policy idea is as follows: "Content containing blatant hate speech, or promotion of or propaganda for prejudicial views". It is far from final.

Results of internal polls can be found "here":/forums/meta/topics/results-of-staff-polling-on-borderline-content-and-rule-0

WIP redrafting of Rule 0 based on feedback so far:[bq]- Do not post content whose only apparent purpose is inciting anger.
- Do not harass others or try to incite violence against them. Harassment can include namecalling, slanderous speech, or other forms of abusive language.
- Do not discriminate or advocate for discrimination on personal characteristics lik(e.g. ethno-cultural groupce, sex, or religion) or advocate for doing so (such as using a mouthpiece to say racism is good).
- Criticism is welcome and encouraged when done so in a constructive and helpful manner. However, using baseless, unconstructive criticism as a veil for the purpose of insulting or attacking an image and/or an artist is not allowed.
- This rule applies to all images, comments, forum posts, and private messages, along with all other interactions you may make on this website.[/bq]

This is to centralize feedback on our current policy refinement. This thread is _not_ for arguing who is and is not a Nazi, the validity of any DNPs, etc., but only on whether you think the policy is good or bad, and why. We will not hesitate to delete posts trying to get into political arguments with others.

The WIP policy idea is as follows: "Content containing blatant hate speech, or promotion of or propaganda for prejudicial views". It is far from final.

Results of internal polls can be found "here":/forums/meta/topics/results-of-staff-polling-on-borderline-content-and-rule-0

WIP redrafting of Rule 0 based on feedback so far:[bq]- Do not post content whose only apparent purpose is inciting anger.
- Do not call for harmingass others.
- Dor ntry to incite hviolence argainsst othersm. ThiHarassment can include namecalling, slanderous speech, or other forms of abusive language.
- Do not discriminate or advocate for discrimination on personal characteristics like ethno-cultural group, sex, or religion (such as using a mouthpiece to say racism is good).
- Criticism is welcome and encouraged when done so in a constructive and helpful manner. However, using baseless, unconstructive criticism as a veil for the purpose of insulting or attacking an image and/or an artist is not allowed.
- This rule applies to all images, comments, forum posts, and private messages, along with all other interactions you may make on this website.[/bq]

This is to centralize feedback on our current policy refinement. This thread is _not_ for arguing who is and is not a Nazi, the validity of any DNPs, etc., but only on whether you think the policy is good or bad, and why. We will not hesitate to delete posts trying to get into political arguments with others.

The WIP policy idea is as follows: "Content containing blatant hate speech, or promotion of or propaganda for prejudicial views". It is far from final.

Results of internal polls can be found "here":/forums/meta/topics/results-of-staff-polling-on-borderline-content-and-rule-0

WIP redrafting of Rule 0 based on feedback so far:[bq]- Do not post content whose only apparent purpose is inciting anger.
- Do not call for harming others.
- Do not harass others. This can include namecalling, slanderous speech, or other forms of abusive language.
- Do not discriminate or advocate for discrimination on personal characteristics like race, sex, thnor -cultural group, sex, or religion (such as using a mouthpiece to say racism is good).
- Criticism is welcome and encouraged when done so in a constructive and helpful manner. However, using baseless, unconstructive criticism as a veil for the purpose of insulting or attacking an image and/or an artist is not allowed.
- This rule applies to all images, comments, forum posts, and private messages, along with all other interactions you may make on this website.[/bq]

This is to centralize feedback on our current policy refinement. This thread is _not_ for arguing who is and is not a Nazi, the validity of any DNPs, etc., but only on whether you think the policy is good or bad, and why. We will not hesitate to delete posts trying to get into political arguments with others.

The WIP policy idea is as follows: "Content containing blatant hate speech, or promotion of or propaganda for prejudicial views". It is far from final.

Results of internal polls can be found "here":/forums/meta/topics/results-of-staff-polling-on-borderline-content-and-rule-0

WIP redrafting of Rule 0 based on feedback so far:[bq]- Do not post content twhat ios intended or nlikely to incite apparguments or punrulineposs. Leeway mayis be given for artcisticng valunger.
- Do not call for harming others.
- Do not harass others. This can include namecalling, slanderous speech, or other forms of abusive language.
- Do not discriminate or advocate for discrimination on personal characteristics like race, sex, or cultural group (such as using a mouthpiece to say racism is good).
- Criticism is welcome and encouraged when done so in a constructive and helpful manner. However, using baseless, unconstructive criticism as a veil for the purpose of insulting or attacking an image and/or an artist is not allowed.
- This rule applies to all images, comments, forum posts, and private messages, along with all other interactions you may make on this website.[/bq]

This is to centralize feedback on our current policy refinement. This thread is _not_ for arguing who is and is not a Nazi, the validity of any DNPs, etc., but only on whether you think the policy is good or bad, and why. We will not hesitate to delete posts trying to get into political arguments with others.

The WIP policy idea is as follows: "Content containing blatant hate speech, or promotion of or propaganda for prejudicial views". It is far from final.

Results of internal polls can be found "here":/forums/meta/topics/results-of-staff-polling-on-borderline-content-and-rule-0

WIP redrafting of Rule 0 based on feedback so far:[bq]- Do not post things of almost no substance or artistic value likely to incite anger.
- Do not post content that is intended or likely to incite arguments or unruliness. Leeway may be given for artistic value.
- Do not call for harming others.
- Do not harass others. This can include namecalling, slanderous speech, or other forms of abusive language.
- Do not discriminate or advocate for it (such as using a mouthpiece to say racism is good).
- Criticism is welcome and encouraged when done so in a constructive and helpful manner. However, using baseless, unconstructive criticism as a veil for the purpose of insulting or attacking an image and/or an artist is not allowed.
- This rule applies to all images, comments, forum posts, and private messages, along with all other interactions you may make on this website.[/bq]

This is to centralize feedback on our current policy refinement. This thread is _not_ for arguing who is and is not a Nazi, the validity of any DNPs, etc., but only on whether you think the policy is good or bad, and why. We will not hesitate to delete posts trying to get into political arguments with others.

The WIP policy idea is as follows: "Content containing blatant hate speech, or promotion of or propaganda for prejudicial views". It is far from final.

Results of internal polls can be found "here":/forums/meta/topics/results-of-staff-polling-on-borderline-content-and-rule-0

WIP redrafting of Rule 0 based on feedback so far:[bq]- Do not post things of almost no substance or artistic value likely to incite anger.
- Do not seripouslyt advocontent that is intended for commlikely tto ingcite arguments or unruligness. Leeway may be given ficor anrtistic vioaluence.
- Do not call for harming othersul.
- Do not harass others. witThis can include name-calling, or similarly slanderous/uncivil speech, or other forms of abusive language.
- Do not discriminate, or promote discrimination on individual ocharacte for istics, (such as race, sex, or culture. Cosintextg matters; a mouthpiece to promotesay racism for instance isn't gokay, while the topic itself can be shown in artworkd).
- Criticism is welcome and encouraged when done so in a constructive and helpful manner. However, using baseless, unconstructive criticism as a veil for the purpose of insulting or attacking an image and/or an artist is not allowed.
- This rule applies to all images, comments, forum posts, and private messages, along with all other interactions you may make on this website.[/bq]

This is to centralize feedback on our current policy refinement. This thread is _not_ for arguing who is and is not a Nazi, the validity of any DNPs, etc., but only on whether you think the policy is good or bad, and why. We will not hesitate to delete posts trying to get into political arguments with others.

The WIP policy idea is as follows: "Content containing blatant hate speech, or promotion of or propaganda for prejudicial views". It is far from final.

Results of internal polls can be found "here":/forums/meta/topics/results-of-staff-polling-on-borderline-content-and-rule-0

WIP redrafting of Rule 0 based on feedback so far:[bq]- Do not "bait" (post in a way likely to hincite angers withof almost no substance or artistic effort, such vas sluddenly mentioning a controversial thing with littlke relationy to the poincite in an argument)r.
- Do not seriously advocate for committing significant violence.
- Do not insult others with name-calling or similarly slanderous/uncivil phrasing.
- Do not discriminate, or promote discrimination on individual characteristics, such as race, sex, or culture. Context matters; a mouthpiece to promote racism for instance isn't okay, while the topic itself can be shown in artwork.
- Criticism is welcome and encouraged when done so in a constructive and helpful manner. However, using baseless, unconstructive criticism as a veil for the purpose of insulting or attacking an image and/or an artist is not allowed.
- This rule applies to all images, comments, forum posts, and private messages, along with all other interactions you may make on this website.[/bq]

This is to centralize feedback on our current policy refinement. This thread is _not_ for arguing who is and is not a Nazi, the validity of any DNPs, etc., but only on whether you think the policy is good or bad, and why. We will not hesitate to delete posts trying to get into political arguments with others.

The WIP policy idea is as follows: "Content containing blatant hate speech, or promotion of or propaganda for prejudicial views". It is far from final.

Results of internal polls can be found "here":/forums/meta/topics/results-of-staff-polling-on-borderline-content-and-rule-0

WIP redrafting of Rule 0 based on feedback so far:[bq]- Do not "bait" (post in a way likely to incite anger with alimosttle realno substance or artistic effort, such as brsuddenly mentionging upa controversial tophicsng with little relation to they wpould inot bein an argumexpecnted).
- Do not seriously advocallte for committing significant violence.
- Do not insult others with name-calling or similarly slanderous/uncivil phrasing.
- Do not discriminate, or promote discrimination, on ainy persondividual chasperacts not earisy to ichanges, such as race, sex, or culture. Context matters; a mouthpiece to promote racism for instance isn't okay, while the topic itself can be shown in artwork.
- Criticism is welcome and encouraged when done so in a constructive and helpful manner. However, using baseless, unconstructive criticism as a veil for the purpose of insulting or attacking an image and/or an artist is not allowed.
- This rule applies to all images, comments, forum posts, and private messages, along with all other interactions you may make on this website.[/bq]

This is to centralize feedback on our current policy refinement. This thread is _not_ for arguing who is and is not a Nazi, the validity of any DNPs, etc., but only on whether you think the policy is good or bad, and why. We will not hesitate to delete posts trying to get into political arguments with others.

The WIP policy idea is as follows: "Content containing blatant hate speech, or promotion of or propaganda for prejudicial views". It is far from final.

Results of internal polls can be found "here":/forums/meta/topics/results-of-staff-polling-on-borderline-content-and-rule-0

WIP redrafting of Rule 0 based on feedback so far:[bq]- Do not "bait" (post in a way likely to incite anger with little real substance, such as bringing up controversial topics where they would not be expected).
- Do not call for violence.
- Do not insult others with name-calling or similarly slanderous/uncivil phrasing.
- Do not discriminate, or promote discrimination, on any personal aspects not easy to change, such as race, sex, or culture. Context matters; a mouthpiece to promote racism isn't okay, while the topic itself can be shown in artwork.
- Criticism is welcome and encouraged when done so in a constructive and helpful manner. However, using baseless, unconstructive criticism as a veil for the purpose of insulting or attacking an image and/or an artist is not allowed.
- This rule applies to all images, comments, forum posts, and private messages, along with all other interactions you may make on this website.[/bq]

This is to centralize feedback on our current policy refinement. This thread is _not_ for arguing who is and is not a Nazi, the validity of any DNPs, etc., but only on whether you think the policy is good or bad, and why. We will not hesitate to delete posts trying to get into political arguments with others.

The WIP policy idea is as follows: "Content containing blatant hate speech, or promotion of or propaganda for prejudicial views". It is far from final.

Results of internal polls can be found "here":/forums/meta/topics/results-of-staff-polling-on-borderline-content-and-rule-0

WIP redrafting of Rule 0 based on feedback so far:[bq]- Do not "bait" (post in a way likely to incite anger with little real substance, such as bringing up controversial topics where they would not be expected).
- Do not call for violence.
- Do not insult others with name-calling or similarly slanderous/uncivil phrasing.
- Do not discriminate, or promote discrimination, on any personal aspects not easy to change, such as race, sex, or culture. Context matters; a mouthpiece to promote racism isn't okay, while the topic itself can be shown in artwork.[/bq]

This is to centralize feedback on our current policy refinement. This thread is _not_ for arguing who is and is not a Nazi, the validity of any DNPs, etc., but only on whether you think the policy is good or bad, and why. We will not hesitate to delete posts trying to get into political arguments with others.

The WIP policy idea is as follows: "Content containing blatant hate speech, or promotion of or propaganda for prejudicial views". It is far from final.

Results of internal polls can be found "here":/forums/meta/topics/results-of-staff-polling-on-borderline-content-and-rule-0