Tag Implications

@Zero Takenaka  
The proper tag is sweetie bot. If you want to suggest a connection, it would go in tag aliases, but since sweetiebot doesn’t contain any images, it’ll probably be refused.

@DragonWraith  
Well, what I was trying to say that if you were searching for sweetiebot it should also bring up sweetie bot. I’m not sure how to add aliases or suggest them. But… you’re right that it should be an alias and not an implication.

@Zero Takenaka  
Click on “tag aliases” in my previous post, it’ll take you to the alias suggestion thread. ;)

hagwarders -> original species  
spiderpony -> original species

@tvc  
@ZONESS  
@Napsack  
Done
 
@Background Pony #DD20  
I’m pretty sure this was suggested before and we decided not to for some reason. I’m not sure what though.
 
@Zero Takenaka  
There is no Sweetiebot tag, only Sweetie Bot.

wildling unicorn -> classical unicorn, cloven hooves, curved horn, original species, unshorn fetlocks

@Joey  
Yeah, it was suggested a while ago; didn’t seem to take effect.
 
“human twilight” should imply “equestria girls” because “human twilight” is a character that only appears in EQG. Same should be done for the other EQG-specific characters, though really only because of the frequency of EQG images not tagged with “equestria girls”.

papercraft → craft

angel bunny -> bunny
 
that makes sense, right?

@toxicitzi  
It would the other way around, since there have been other bunnies in the show, and crossovers with Officer Carrots Hopps from Zootopia.

@toxicitzi  
Backwards. Angel bunny -> bunny  
Angel implies bunny but bunny cannot imply Angel.
 
Edit: And of course I notice after I post, that @TexasUberAlles replied already.

peryton -> deer

chickun -> scootaloo

@Background Pony #6BA3  
chickun should imply op is a duck while we’re at it; there can’t be more than a handful that are actually referencing Scootaloo making a derpface instead of just being a tired-ass maymaychan “haha she r a chiggun lolkeklolo” shitpost.

@toxicitzi  
@Brokedownandmadeone
 
Generally we don’t imply characters to their canon species. For example, you don’t tag “griffon” on a picture of just Gilda, but you would if it was another non-griffon character in griffon form. At least I’m pretty sure that’s how it’s supposed to work.
 
@DragonWraith  
I have no idea what that is, but ok.
 
 
@Background Pony #6BA3  
Chickun -> excellent way to get banned

@Joey  
A peryton is basically a deer with wings.
 

Yeah, that would set a bad precedent. Not only would it be redundant, but it would require removing the species tag if they’re species swap’d.

@Joey  
Joey. It’s been 10 days.

@Kappe  
After reviewing it, I decided that the implication is valid enough, and I’m not removing it.

The existing implication bust -> headshot seems backwards, as a bust would be anything above the navel, while a headshot would be anything above the collarbone.  
It should be:  
headshot -> bust  
and the existing implication should be deleted, since all headshots are busts, but not all busts are headshots.

@DragonWraith  
Headshots are also a thing you can do with a gun. Does “headshot” ever refer, on this site, to the thing snipers do?
 
[I did a search.]
 
I guess not.

Shiningvelvet → incest, infidelity, mother and son, shining armor, shipping, straight, twilight velvet

jelly bunch → berry punch, breasts

rumblebetes → rumble, cute

palette swap -> edit, recolor  
(edit is implied by recolor, so I’m implying it here too.)