Tell us stuff that needs doing
when she felt her wings unfold 
Goodbye Ponk Pie Hat
Could the embed function’s “Thumbnailed Textile” provide relative links like
please? Safe example. At the moment it uses the absolute URI of the site the user is currently using (
This is a little unhelpful to users coming in via the other site, because they may not be logged in to the site where the link points.
!``//derpicdn.net/img/2013/8/27/412175/medium.jpeg``!``:/412175please? Safe example. At the moment it uses the absolute URI of the site the user is currently using (
derpibooru.org or derpiboo.ru):!``//derpicdn.net/img/2013/8/27/412175/medium.jpeg``!``:https://derpiboo.ru/412175This is a little unhelpful to users coming in via the other site, because they may not be logged in to the site where the link points.
Mad Black 
How about an art tag for everything that isn’t pornographic, meme, sketch, screenshot and/or vector from the show?
I think this would be useful, if you want to search the safe pictures without filtering out the memes or something. And it would be a nice tag to ad to the watch list.
It could even be applied for suggestive and some questionable pictures. Even if the line is pretty thin when it is art and when not.
I think this would be useful, if you want to search the safe pictures without filtering out the memes or something. And it would be a nice tag to ad to the watch list.
It could even be applied for suggestive and some questionable pictures. Even if the line is pretty thin when it is art and when not.
The Smiling Pony 
( ͠° ͟ʖ ͡° )
@Mad Black
Except a lot of porn is pretty damn good art, a lot of “art” uses memes, and a lot of sketches are more “artful” than fully finished pieces. What counts as “art” is too hilariously subjective to have as a tag.
Except a lot of porn is pretty damn good art, a lot of “art” uses memes, and a lot of sketches are more “artful” than fully finished pieces. What counts as “art” is too hilariously subjective to have as a tag.
Mad Black
@The Smiling Pony
Well if the nudity is artful enough, it still counts as art. And monochrome art is good as well. Witch Sketch i mean more doodles and outlines.
And I know it is pretty subjective sometimes. Comics are Art too. But i wouldn’t tag them with this tag eighter.
It should be more like for very good single pieces. Where you really see the time which was spend to making them. More like a category really.
like this pieces of raikoh for example
or some NSFW examples, both by sundown
>>459675 (merged) I would consider this as art.
>>446699 this not so much. since the purpose of this image is an other. It is even more like three single pictures. but they don’t really interact with each other.
But as you said. Very subjective.
Well if the nudity is artful enough, it still counts as art. And monochrome art is good as well. Witch Sketch i mean more doodles and outlines.
And I know it is pretty subjective sometimes. Comics are Art too. But i wouldn’t tag them with this tag eighter.
It should be more like for very good single pieces. Where you really see the time which was spend to making them. More like a category really.
like this pieces of raikoh for example
or some NSFW examples, both by sundown
>>459675 (merged) I would consider this as art.
>>446699 this not so much. since the purpose of this image is an other. It is even more like three single pictures. but they don’t really interact with each other.
But as you said. Very subjective.
The Smiling Pony
( ͠° ͟ʖ ͡° )
But are you going to tell me stuff Atryl does, in 30 minutes or less, isn’t art because it didn’t take much time? Or because it’s pornographic?
We don’t need a tag for “this is high quality ‘real’ art”. That’s what filters, negative search and score threshholds are for.
We don’t need a tag for “this is high quality ‘real’ art”. That’s what filters, negative search and score threshholds are for.
Background Pony #592F
@Mad Black
Just bookmark this search: art tag
Also, I think the existence of “modern art” should show you exactly why an art tag is doomed to fail. If you really want to have a tag for images which meet your personal standards of what art should be, I suggest using your favourites list: faved_by:Mad Black
Just bookmark this search: art tag
Also, I think the existence of “modern art” should show you exactly why an art tag is doomed to fail. If you really want to have a tag for images which meet your personal standards of what art should be, I suggest using your favourites list: faved_by:Mad Black
Mad Black
OK.
How about an list where you can see all the artist tags?
Maybe with some statistics with how many pictures it has, tags mostly associated with, or percents which systems tags apply the most, and a short timeline like the one by the users?
How about an list where you can see all the artist tags?
Maybe with some statistics with how many pictures it has, tags mostly associated with, or percents which systems tags apply the most, and a short timeline like the one by the users?
Background Pony #592F
@Mad Black
I’d guess it would be too much work for the database to fetch all that data on a regular basis.
If possible though, it would be very nice to see tag graphs like that. Maybe even implement a simpler version which lets you visualise stuff like “which tags are most often associated with <x> tag?”
I’d guess it would be too much work for the database to fetch all that data on a regular basis.
If possible though, it would be very nice to see tag graphs like that. Maybe even implement a simpler version which lets you visualise stuff like “which tags are most often associated with <x> tag?”
Background Pony #592F
@tetrisman64
The argument is that allowing users to delete/edit images leaves the system too open to abuse. Image uploaders don’t really get treated any differently than normal users, aside from the ability to edit the description.
Actually, does anyone know why the description isn’t open to public editing? It seems strange to restrict that but nothing else.
The argument is that allowing users to delete/edit images leaves the system too open to abuse. Image uploaders don’t really get treated any differently than normal users, aside from the ability to edit the description.
Actually, does anyone know why the description isn’t open to public editing? It seems strange to restrict that but nothing else.
UnicronX
I Have a question Regarding the new Update scheduled for tommarow.
Will the update render the site Incompatible for some users at all, or in anyway?
I.E users who use A Kindle Touch, or 3ds?
Will the update render the site Incompatible for some users at all, or in anyway?
I.E users who use A Kindle Touch, or 3ds?
Background Pony #9418
I have a question about a bug, if it is a bug or known or something. Sometimes on image pages the default large.png or large.jpg (never happens with GIFs) image will load twice. I haven’t clicked it or reloaded the page or anything when it happens. It just randomly happens after it’s done or nearly done loading the first time around. This doesn’t happen very often.
Browser: Firefox 20.0.1
Browser: Firefox 20.0.1
Mad Black
Well Comment pages do take longer to load than usual. As do faves and likes. If you go to the next page it seems to be stuck for about 2 or 3 seconds before it loads the next page. Maybe it’s just a bit quirky at the moment, I hope.
dt 
No Thank You
List of users who faved a pic do not show up for me. I know it shouldn’t be empty because I fave every pic I post.
Bolan
Probably just a temporary problem with the code changes being made, but you can upvote an image multiple times at the moment.
Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
This topic has been locked to new posts from non-moderators.
Locked
Lock reason: New threads created - obsolete