Background Pony #52BA
[@☬ ᏝᏆᏁᏨᎾᏝᏁᏰᏒᎬᎳᏕᎿᎬᏒᎱᎯᏁ ☬](/forums/tagging/topics/general-tag-discussion?post_id=5235252#post_5235252), [@Background Pony \#52BA](/forums/tagging/topics/general-tag-discussion?post_id=5235268#post_5235268), [@☬ ᏝᏆᏁᏨᎾᏝᏁᏰᏒᎬᎳᏕᎿᎬᏒᎱᎯᏁ ☬](/forums/tagging/topics/general-tag-discussion?post_id=5235638#post_5235638)
So, is the description for [snip (coat marking)](/tags/snip+%2528coat+marking%2529) going to be fixed any time soon?
---
A BP (I'd bet all the same BP) has been tagging quite a few pictures as [e-cup bra](/tags/e-dash-cup+bra) over the past year or two. They're [not tagging any other size](/tags?tq=*cup+bra) and I'd also judge they're applying the tag over too widely-varying a range for it to possibly be accurate, anyway. Should the tag get nuked? I might even have submitted a report to investigate the BP's tagging behavior, but I already have the max 3 open reports.
So, is the description for [snip (coat marking)](/tags/snip+%2528coat+marking%2529) going to be fixed any time soon?
---
A BP (I'd bet all the same BP) has been tagging quite a few pictures as [e-cup bra](/tags/e-dash-cup+bra) over the past year or two. They're [not tagging any other size](/tags?tq=*cup+bra) and I'd also judge they're applying the tag over too widely-varying a range for it to possibly be accurate, anyway. Should the tag get nuked? I might even have submitted a report to investigate the BP's tagging behavior, but I already have the max 3 open reports.