Brainless-Mind
[@saby](/forums/tagging/topics/general-tag-discussion?post_id=5190298#post_5190298)
[@rautamiekka](/forums/tagging/topics/general-tag-discussion?post_id=5254754#post_5254754)
This should give you some insight.
[@Brainless-Mind](/forums/tagging/topics/general-tag-discussion?post_id=5190161#post_5190161)
> For the past several weeks, I have been bringing this tag up to speed and created a new tag to go alongside it:
>
>
> [tail hole](/tags/tail+hole)
> [implied tail hole](/tags/implied+tail+hole)
>
>
> I have been using the first tag for instances where a tail hole can clearly be seen or the outline/implications of one are present.
> I have been using the second one (which I made) for times where a tail can be seen protruding from clothing, but there is no implication of a hole present.
>
>
> Have I been using these tags in the correct manner?
[@rautamiekka](/forums/tagging/topics/general-tag-discussion?post_id=5254754#post_5254754)
This should give you some insight.
[@Brainless-Mind](/forums/tagging/topics/general-tag-discussion?post_id=5190161#post_5190161)
> For the past several weeks, I have been bringing this tag up to speed and created a new tag to go alongside it:
>
>
> [tail hole](/tags/tail+hole)
> [implied tail hole](/tags/implied+tail+hole)
>
>
> I have been using the first tag for instances where a tail hole can clearly be seen or the outline/implications of one are present.
> I have been using the second one (which I made) for times where a tail can be seen protruding from clothing, but there is no implication of a hole present.
>
>
> Have I been using these tags in the correct manner?