Viewing last 25 versions of post by rautamiekka in topic General Tag Discussion

[@Brainless-Mind](/forums/tagging/topics/general-tag-discussion?post_id=5254756#post_5254756)
> [@saby](/forums/tagging/topics/general-tag-discussion?post_id=5190298#post_5190298)
> [@rautamiekka](/forums/tagging/topics/general-tag-discussion?post_id=5254754#post_5254754)
>
> This should give you some insight.
>
> [@Brainless-Mind](/forums/tagging/topics/general-tag-discussion?post_id=5190161#post_5190161)
> > For the past several weeks, I have been bringing this tag up to speed and created a new tag to go alongside it:
> >
> >
> > [tail hole](/tags/tail+hole)
> > [implied tail hole](/tags/implied+tail+hole)
> >
> >
> > I have been using the first tag for instances where a tail hole can clearly be seen or the outline/implications of one are present.
> > I have been using the second one (which I made) for times where a tail can be seen protruding from clothing, but there is no implication of a hole present.
> >
> >
> > Have I been using these tags in the correct manner?
>

Fair enough, but there's ||`anus cameltoe`||, for ex, but I seem to recall its usage was particular.