🐴 
IRL 🎠 stallion
@Background Pony #7C7A
Make
Make
oc:dream2 an alias for the canonical superscript 2. It’s like the • in Dall•EGeneral Tag Discussion
🂾𝕃𝕚𝕟𝕔𝕠𝕝𝕟𝔹𝕣𝕖𝕨𝕤𝕥𝕖𝕣𝔽𝕒𝕟🂽 
Goodbye guys ;)
@☬ ᏝᏆᏁᏨᎾᏝᏁᏰᏒᎬᎳᏕᎿᎬᏒᎱᎯᏁ ☬
“²” cannot be easily typed on a standard Android/Windows keyboard, which is problematic.
But typing her other name should bring it up in the tag box? I would think so c:
much as I like the superscript, if it’s too cumbersome typing it should probably alias into her other name 😞🙂
Background Pony #52BA
oc:dream vezpyre and oc:dream² appear to be synonyms, any insight?
Upon looking into it a little further, the OC owner applied both tags to images which is a bit confusing. It appears the OC owner is deceased, so the best we’d be able to find out is from someone else who was familiar with the character.
Background Pony #7C7A
@JP
The building has a David’s Star on it, so I guess it’s supposed to be a synagogue. But it doesn’t seem related to the pictures. Perhaps this person wanted a unique tag to create a personal gallery, using the functionality they already know? I think mods should talk to them.
The building has a David’s Star on it, so I guess it’s supposed to be a synagogue. But it doesn’t seem related to the pictures. Perhaps this person wanted a unique tag to create a personal gallery, using the functionality they already know? I think mods should talk to them.
EDIT: See also the artist tag and tag history of
It looks like they are acting in good faith (uploaded an image with description and tags), but someone should explain galleries to them.
🐴
IRL 🎠 stallion
@☬ ᏝᏆᏁᏨᎾᏝᏁᏰᏒᎬᎳᏕᎿᎬᏒᎱᎯᏁ ☬
Why not make the superscript the canonical name and the easy-to-type versions the aliases?
Why not make the superscript the canonical name and the easy-to-type versions the aliases?
🂾𝕃𝕚𝕟𝕔𝕠𝕝𝕟𝔹𝕣𝕖𝕨𝕤𝕥𝕖𝕣𝔽𝕒𝕟🂽
Goodbye guys ;)
@☬ ᏝᏆᏁᏨᎾᏝᏁᏰᏒᎬᎳᏕᎿᎬᏒᎱᎯᏁ ☬
Why not make the superscript the canonical name and the easy-to-type versions the aliases?
That’s what I was thinking originally, but this user said it’s too hard to type superscript on PC.
oc:dream vezpyre and oc:dream² appear to be synonyms, any insight?Upon looking into it a little further, the OC owner applied both tags to images which is a bit confusing. It appears the OC owner is deceased, so the best we’d be able to find out is from someone else who was familiar with the character.
Aww wow sorry to hear that, had no clue. My condolences D:
Background Pony #52BA
How much fetlocks qualify as unshorn fetlocks? For example, >>1210308 is currently tagged with it but I don’t think it should.
Background Pony #7C7A
@Background Pony #52BA
Unshorn fetlocks has a wide meaning. From long locks of hair to just a slight indication that some hair are covering the top of the hoof. That’s the status quo.
Unshorn fetlocks has a wide meaning. From long locks of hair to just a slight indication that some hair are covering the top of the hoof. That’s the status quo.
There’s also hoof fluff, which is overlapping with unshorn fetlocks because none of them are defined. For me hoof fluff sounds like it should be used when the hoof is not hard, but just a part of a fluffy, soft leg and there is an increase of fluff on the hoof; as opposed to hair growing above the hard hoof and then flowing down over the hoof.
And yes, I believe the meme deserves its own tag.
LightningBolt 
![Thread Starter - [NO SPOILER, LEAK-FREE] Season 8 Discussion and Speculation: Discovery Family airings](https://derpicdn.net/badges/2017/7/2/0bd59d4eff9c3aeaad.svg "Thread Starter - [NO SPOILER, LEAK-FREE] Season 8 Discussion and Speculation: Discovery Family airings")
Senior Moderator
Undead inside
@Background Pony #7C7A
Hoof fluff to me is this.
Why yes this is my own art.
But anyway, he doesn’t have separate visible hooves like Big Mac, just furry ones.
Hoof fluff to me is this.
Why yes this is my own art.
But anyway, he doesn’t have separate visible hooves like Big Mac, just furry ones.
LightningBolt
Senior Moderator
Undead inside
@Background Pony #7C7A
Would it be nepotism to use him for an example on the tag?
Would it be nepotism to use him for an example on the tag?
I guess it ain’t gonna hurt.
LightningBolt
Senior Moderator
Undead inside
@☬ ᏝᏆᏁᏨᎾᏝᏁᏰᏒᎬᎳᏕᎿᎬᏒᎱᎯᏁ ☬
I did it, also did one for unshorn fetlocks too.
I did it, also did one for unshorn fetlocks too.
Background Pony #52BA
@LightningBolt, @Background Pony #7C7A
I thought “hoof fluff” was for fluff where hooves are supposed to be; almost literally furred hooves >>2612147
I thought “hoof fluff” was for fluff where hooves are supposed to be; almost literally furred hooves >>2612147
@LightningBolt
Nepotism doesn’t matter, but in general, I think canon characters are better for example pictures when possible.
Nepotism doesn’t matter, but in general, I think canon characters are better for example pictures when possible.
What is the tag twitter link for? IMO, it’s for pictures that have someone’s Twitter account name written in the image (and may or may not have a Twitter logo), to be distinct from the twitter tag itself which is only for images whose content is about Twitter. However, it seems to also be getting used on posts where the source is Twitter or there’s a hyperlink to Twitter in the description. Is that misusing it?
Background Pony #52BA
@LightningBolt
Might also want to set up descriptions/examples for fetlock tuft >>2007060 “An extra burst of hair coming off the back of legs near the hooves, but not surrounding the hooves like unshorn fetlocks do” (and clean up use of the tag, because a lot of the images so tagged are merely ordinary unshorn fetlocks)
Might also want to set up descriptions/examples for fetlock tuft >>2007060 “An extra burst of hair coming off the back of legs near the hooves, but not surrounding the hooves like unshorn fetlocks do” (and clean up use of the tag, because a lot of the images so tagged are merely ordinary unshorn fetlocks)
and feathered fetlocks >>1931339 or >>1818987, “Feathers near a creature’s hooves, in the manner of fetlocks except they’re feathers, not fur”
🂾𝕃𝕚𝕟𝕔𝕠𝕝𝕟𝔹𝕣𝕖𝕨𝕤𝕥𝕖𝕣𝔽𝕒𝕟🂽
Goodbye guys ;)
@LightningBolt
Might also want to set up descriptions/examples for fetlock tuft >>2007060 “An extra burst of hair coming off the back of legs near the hooves, but not surrounding the hooves like unshorn fetlocks do” (and clean up use of the tag, because a lot of the images so tagged are merely ordinary unshorn fetlocks)and feathered fetlocks >>1931339 or >>1818987, “Feathers near a creature’s hooves, in the manner of fetlocks except they’re feathers, not fur”
I could not remember that term for the life of me; need it for my kirin images. Thank you :)
LightningBolt
Senior Moderator
Undead inside
@Background Pony #52BA
I’ll do them too, thanks. Gonna use vectors for examples tho, they are more objective, sorry.
I’ll do them too, thanks. Gonna use vectors for examples tho, they are more objective, sorry.
LightningBolt
Senior Moderator
Undead inside
@Background Pony #52BA
No canon characters that have that, and show accurate examples are better as they are less dependent on artist styles and quirks. Both (small fluff and lots of fluff) are the same thing too.
No canon characters that have that, and show accurate examples are better as they are less dependent on artist styles and quirks. Both (small fluff and lots of fluff) are the same thing too.
LightningBolt
Senior Moderator
Undead inside
I am sorry to use another one of my characters, I just couldn’t think of any others. :v
And sorry for triple posting.
Background Pony #7C7A
@LightningBolt
It’s OK, the choice of character is not that important.
It’s OK, the choice of character is not that important.
@LightningBolt
I think it’s best to have 2-3 examples with different art styles and/or different variants of the tagged thing, where applicable. Helps people generalize.
I think it’s best to have 2-3 examples with different art styles and/or different variants of the tagged thing, where applicable. Helps people generalize.
EDIT:
@Background Pony #7C7A
Oh, and sometimes the hoof is not differently colored, but the location of the fetlocks is meant to separate the hoof from the rest of the leg. I consider that to be unshorn fetlocks, not hoof fluff. For example this would be unshorn fetlocks because the hair is above the hoof:
And this would be hoof fluff because it’s not meant to be a visual separator for the hoof, but fluff on the hoof itself:
@Background Pony #7C7A
Oh, and sometimes the hoof is not differently colored, but the location of the fetlocks is meant to separate the hoof from the rest of the leg. I consider that to be unshorn fetlocks, not hoof fluff. For example this would be unshorn fetlocks because the hair is above the hoof:
And this would be hoof fluff because it’s not meant to be a visual separator for the hoof, but fluff on the hoof itself:
Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!