Looking through those tags, I don’t think I’d really be opposed to having them aliased. “hips” is essentially used in the same way as “wide hips”, I don’t think it would be useful as a “regular-sized hips” or “hips are present” sort of tag, and even if it was, people would use it to mean “wide hips” regardless.
Looking through the results once more, “hips” certainly looks to be used to mean “wide hips,” but then I add “screencap” and there are several cropped pictures which
probably don’t qualify as wide hips. So if “hips” is aliased to “wide hips,” some kind of ‘hips focus’ tag should be created for all those ‘hipshots.’
I just learned there’s already a
leg focus tag though. Turns that’s where the description for
legs was. So,
that tag already has a description available, it just needs to be brought to it. Maybe with something like ‘despite the name, imagine this to be
thigh focus in contrast to the whole leg of leg focus,’ haha.
@Litrojia
@Background Pony #4B0C
Yeah, clunky is a good word to use, especially when those ‘minutia’ tags bring an upload to
wall of tags territory when it wasn’t there without them.
Equestria Girls clothes alone already mean
many tags if you want to be thorough, sometimes.
Looking at
eyes open, it’s the same gulf between it and
eyes closed as between the mouth tags. I can imagine browsing specifically for “closed mouth,smiling” in the name of art references, but that’s all. And they won’t find even 50 results as of now, anyway.
Thanks for the help.
—
I need
more clarification about hats, please.
That’s a
sports visor on her head, correct? This specific picture is already tagged
visor, which… isn’t the same thing according to the results. At all.
I want to make sure before I bring the
sports visor tag up from its grand total of
7 results.