It’s a question about all the images tagged:
circumcised
How do we know, that those erect penises are actually circumcised?
If they are soft, it’s more likely (though a foreskin can still be retracted over glans).
But, when they are erect, it’s actually quite common for uncircumcised penises to have their foreskin fully retracted behind the enlarged glans (depending on a person of course). And yes, I can vouch for that, since I’ve seen real ones that were non-circumcised.
So, unless it’s tagged that way by an artist, is it really correct for people to add that tag to all such images, which could actually be as well uncircumcised?
Example images / GIFs:
Yes, an erect uncircumcised penis can look that way (depending on individual’s foreskin and glans size).
I personally think, that such tags shouldn’t be added by others, if an artist didn’t specify it, when there’s often no actual way to tell the difference between two types, when erect.
What do you all think?