Happy Birthday, MLP:FiM! MLP:FiM turns 9 years old this year! Let's celebrate with an art event!

Viewing last 10 versions of post by Princess Luna on Rating tags general

Princess Luna's avatar
Posts: 2245
Princess Luna
From the Night
Magnificent Metadata Maniac - #1 Assistant
A Perfectly Normal Pony - <%Nebulon> Yeah, just fetch me a smaller anus, sweetie.
Economist

Site Moderator
Site Developer
Tag Czar
"@LightningBolt":/tagging/rating-tags-general/post/4494438#post_4494438
Thanks for adding to the discussion; I've changed the second one to Explicit. Do you agree on the image brought up with plots facing the viewer and then edited with Spike, by the way?

"@Damaged":/tagging/rating-tags-general/post/4494449#post_4494449
Definitely...the hard part is that writing more words into the guidelines doesn't usually help, as it can just confuse people, but writing less makes for less distinguishment. I feel the current _intent_ of the ratings is really good right now simply because there are very few cases where a bit of reasoning on specifics can't be used to arrive on a definitive rating (or at least two adjacent ones). Unfortunately, the actual text falls short, and I see no way to rewrite things to overcome that, so it does still need a lot of explanation.
Consistency is the main goal, a lot of my current focus is on making sure we rate somewhat like e621 tags; a lot of my current focus is on making sure we rate somewhat like e621 tags: ignoring context.
No reason given
Edited by Princess Luna
Princess Luna's avatar
Posts: 2245
Princess Luna
From the Night
Magnificent Metadata Maniac - #1 Assistant
A Perfectly Normal Pony - <%Nebulon> Yeah, just fetch me a smaller anus, sweetie.
Economist

Site Moderator
Site Developer
Tag Czar
"@LightningBolt":/tagging/rating-tags-general/post/4494438#post_4494438
Thanks for adding to the discussion; I've changed the second one to Explicit. Do you agree on the image brought up with plots facing the viewer and then edited with Spike, by the way?

"@Damaged":/tagging/rating-tags-general/post/4494449#post_4494449
Definitely...the hard part is that writing more words into the guidelines doesn't usually help, as it can just confuse people, but writing less makes for less distinguishment.
I feel the current _intent_ of the ratings is really good right now simply because there are very few cases where a bit of reasoning on specifics can'vet changedbe used to arrive on a definitive rating (or at least two adjacent ones). Unfortunately, the secondactual onetext falls short, and I see no way to Explicit. Dorewrite youthings agreeto overcome that, so it does still need a lot of explanation.
Consistency is the main goal, a lot of my current focus is
on themaking imagesure broughtwe uprate withsomewhat plotslike facinge621 thetags; ignoring viewer and then edited with Spike, by the way?context.
No reason given
Edited by Princess Luna
Princess Luna's avatar
Posts: 2245
Princess Luna
From the Night
Magnificent Metadata Maniac - #1 Assistant
A Perfectly Normal Pony - <%Nebulon> Yeah, just fetch me a smaller anus, sweetie.
Economist

Site Moderator
Site Developer
Tag Czar
"@LightningBolt":/tagging/rating-tags-general/post/4494438#post_4494438
Thanks for adding to the discussion, I've changed the second one to Explicit. Do you agree on the image brought up with plots facing the viewer and then edited with Spike, by the way?
No reason given
Edited by Princess Luna

Back