Thanks for adding to the discussion
Thanks for adding to the discussion; I've changed the second one to Explicit. Do you agree on the image brought up with plots facing the viewer and then edited with Spike, by the way?
Definitely...the hard part is that writing more words into the guidelines doesn't usually help, as it can just confuse people, but writing less makes for less distinguishment. I feel the current _intent_ of the ratings is really good right now simply because there are very few cases where a bit of reasoning on specifics can't be used to arrive on a definitive rating (or at least two adjacent ones). Unfortunately, the actual text falls short, and I see no way to rewrite things to overcome that, so it does still need a lot of explanation.
Consistency is the main goal
, a lot of my current focus is on making sure we rate somewhat like e621 tags ; ignoring context.