"Text" tag

I feel like I’m misunderstanding the “Text” tag. I have the tag hidden on my default filter because I’m not really interested in screencaps of Twitter posts or greentexts uploaded as images. Sometimes, I notice that I can’t see the featured image, swap to a different filter, and see that the featured image has a caption or a line of dialog on it. Based on my understanding, those things have different tags, so I removed the “Text” tag from such images. The current image of the pony doing the math lady meme is an example of this.
 
Thing is, this happens somewhat regularly, and I’ll occasionally come back later to find the tag re-added. This causes me some doubt. Am I misunderstanding the tag, and it should be applied in those situations? Am I on point and should continue as I have been? Should I just butt out in general and leave tagging to people more official than I? I want to understand!

You might wanna filter out text only or more specific tags instead of just adding or removing the tag from images you like and don’t like.

Why can’t there be a “texting” tag? EG have phones!

@Background Pony #91Z0  
There is.

Nice!

@LightningBolt  
Is there a background pony tag?

Wait I mean a tag for a background pony character in the show

@LightningBolt
 
I- This has little to do with whether or not I enjoy the pictures in question. What I’m confused about is why images such as the current featured image have the tag on them when the description of the tag is “The bulk or meaning of these images (e.g. screenshots of Twitter posts) lies in words.” I’m not sure it matches, but I seem to be wrong?

@Background Pony #91Z0  
Please make your own thread.

@LightningBolt  
Ok

@ZXNFQT4  
I’d recommend linking some examples. If there’s images with a small amount of “text” on the image that’s supposed to be from a speaking character, dialogue is what it should be tagged with. Not text. Still don’t get why that tagging keeps getting misinterpreted and incorrectly applied.
 
See related threads: Speech vs Dialogue  
“Dialogue” tag clarification

@Brokedownandmadeone  
 
This is the most recent example I have and what prompted me to make this post in the first place. Based on my interpretation of the description of the tag, I have my doubts that this image needs the text tag. dialog also doesn’t seem to apply.
 
Another example that doesn’t seem to need text or dialog would be  

 
It seems like the text tag has come to mean “any words on an image”, which is different than “The bulk or meaning of these images (e.g. screenshots of Twitter posts) lies in words,” which the tag claims to mean. Ultimately, this doesn’t really matter, but it could be changed on either side. Either text could be embraced to mean this while text only means what text used to, or one could attempt to wrangle the current meaning of text back under control. I should really emphasize, though, that this doesn’t really matter. I’m just one confused person who wishes things made more sense.

@ZXNFQT4  
(For image previews from on-site, the syntax would be >>2120230p (>>2120230) and >>2350117p (>>2350117) respectively)
 
I’d argue that the 2nd one might qualify for the text tag because the text implores the viewer to read it and follow the directions. Though yeah, it doesn’t exactly take the “bulk of the meaning” of the image. That’s actually a grey area for the use of the tag.  
What annoys me is that the text tag is getting added to several images that would qualify for the dialogue tag instead.

@Brokedownandmadeone  
(Ah, thanks. I don’t post often, so this formatting is pretty foreign to me.)
 
Fair. It is a bit grey. I’m not sure how to clarify the definition, or what good it’d even do to do so. I highly doubt anyone feels like going on a crusade to re-tag images based on a new definition of text. Even then, I don’t know how much it’d matter since others wouldn’t know and would continue to tag based on a previous understanding.
 
Either way, I guess I’m glad not to be alone in my confusion/annoyance at the text tag. Cheers, mate.