Don't blame me, I voted for the other guy. (Politics General)

You share everything or else you are unpersoned.

1. The falling rate of profit makes it inherently unstable and bound to fail  
    
   Simple enough  
2. The offset by increasing wealth is this  
   Furthermore: When does a society find itself in a condition of advancing wealth? When the capitals and the revenues of a country are growing. But this is only possible:
    
   (a) As the result of the accumulation of much labour, capital being accumulated labour; as the result, therefore, of the fact that more and more of his products are being taken away from the worker, that to an increasing extent his own labour confronts him as another man’s property and that the means of his existence and his activity are increasingly concentrated in the hands of the capitalist.
    
   (b) The accumulation of capital increases the division of labour, and the division of labour increases the number of workers. Conversely, the number of workers increases the division of labour, just as the division of labour increases the accumulation of capital. With this division of labour on the one hand and the accumulation of capital on the other, the worker becomes ever more exclusively dependent on labour, and on a particular, very one-sided, machine-like labour at that. Just as he is thus depressed spiritually and physically to the condition of a machine and from being a man becomes an abstract activity and a belly, so he also becomes ever more dependent on every fluctuation in market price, on the application of capital, and on the whim of the rich. Equally, the increase in the class of people wholly dependent on work intensifies competition among the workers, thus lowering their price. In the factory system this situation of the worker reaches its climax.
    
   (c) In an increasingly prosperous society only the richest of the rich can continue to live on money interest. Everyone else has to carry on a business with his capital, or venture it in trade. As a result, the competition between the capitalists becomes more intense. The concentration of capital increases, the big capitalists ruin the small, and a section of the erstwhile capitalists sinks into the working class, which as a result of this supply again suffers to some extent a depression of wages and passes into a still greater dependence on the few big capitalists. The number of capitalists having been diminished, their competition with respect to the workers scarcely exists any longer; and the number of workers having been increased, their competition among themselves has become all the more intense, unnatural, and violent. Consequently, a section of the working class falls into beggary or starvation just as necessarily as a section of the middle capitalists falls into the working class.
    
   Hence even in the condition of society most favorable to the worker, the inevitable result for the worker is overwork and premature death, decline to a mere machine, a bond servant of capital, which piles up dangerously over and against him, more competition, and starvation or beggary for a section of the workers.- The philosophic and economic manuscripts of 1844  
   Not to mention the spectacle, that in late capitalism our lives are dominated by images where content is meaningless to the form  
3. The inherent state of capitalism is stagnation and attempts to lift us out of that stagnation just makes things worse
    
   So I have economic texts, videos and graphs behind my back  
   And all you have is a video by some guy with “Otaku” in his name  
   Your move

@SonGokuMonkey
Columbia is very much capitalist and has a right leaning government.

@Ereiam
But they want to put all the power into the private sector which is still a form of power, and more dangerous than the government having total centralized power.

And fascists still don’t go against everything ancaps believe in since Mussolini still implemented liberal market principles and had a classical liberal as his economic adviser, fascism is still very much pro-capitalist despite a lot of modern conservatives claiming it was a form of socialism.

@Turkeynomster
Communism isn’t a planned economy, there is no wage labor under communism. The Soviet Union which most people think of when they hear about Communism was state capitalism trying to transition to communism, Lenin himself admitted this.

Now the only argument it has left is ankle biting moral indignation and there is nothing impressive about a sanctimonious lecture of morality from a place of supposed nihilism.

… What is this gibberish?