@Philweasel
Well, in terms of booking, there are a few solutions:
1: Trim down the roster of excess talents or have, say, 1/4th of roster on time off for a few months (maybe 3) with some form of pay to at least cover some basic expenses and allow them to rest up, let their bodies heal more, lessen feelings of burn-out.
2: Have Wrestlers who participate in particularly grueling/brutal matches sell the finish/aftermath by appearing less for a short while, or appear bandaged up during interviews to sell it, with other stars facing off against champions so we could see different matches rather than get the same repeated match-ups all the time, using interviews and SHORT backstage segments to continue feuds; don’t give away a hot feud’s PPV quality match on free TV.
3: Not all feuds need a title to make them interesting. Maybe on wrestler hates another for screwing them out of a title shot/victory, or they had a rivalry that started earlier in their careers or some other mater; just leave out race, religion, politics, nationality, or at least keep it to a minimum.
4: Title holders should have a higher win-loss ratio as champions, and should defend more often. To make the non-title holders look less like jobbers, they could be booked to win more often when facing each other or actually land decent offense in competitive matches rather than getting squashed. Plus, Champions look stronger when they’re like “the Cobra who struck down the mighty lion rather than a sick monkey”.
(Honestly, I’d rather save jobber for the dark matches, house shows, and opening matches for the lower mid-card wrestlers to get built up)
5: Quality over quantity when it comes to title runs; make them meaningful, competitive, not overly long nor pointlessly short, try not to have title changes be predictable, avoid being too repetitive with the same champions/match-ups, etc.
And honestly, the heavy work scheduel and rushed, inadiquate injury recovery time are big reasons wrestlers become addicted to stuff to cope with the pain.
As far as a wellness policy, I wouldn’t follow McMahon’s as there are sever aspects that I 100% disagree with (such as the “only form OUR doctors” mentality), but I’ve got a few ideas that are outside the box but might work:
Health care and say that taking certain precautionary measure would make it easier to keep providing it, like minimizing direct high-impacts to the head and cooperating in drug/medical testing to avoid certain unnecessary risks to safety. And as I said before, adjust schedueling to allow more rest/recovery time, have contingency plans incase someone is out of action for extended periods of time due to serious injury/illness/etc.
There’s no garuntee it would work and many promoters would disagree, but I’m not going to try to think like them; I’m looking at it as somebody who would be making decisions based on sucesses and mistakes of others, being sent back armed with hindsight and knowledge.