Uploaded by dt 
1084x800 JPG 449 kB
Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
No description provided.
Tags
+-SH safe2173924 +-SH artist:tyuubatu251 +-SH rainbow dash279853 +-SH starlight glimmer59976 +-SH twilight sparkle357669 +-SH alicorn314052 +-SH pony1602092 +-SH g42028571 +-SH the cutie re-mark3539 +-SH blowing whistle283 +-SH female1802239 +-SH filly97347 +-SH implied foalcon1736 +-SH lesbian117626 +-SH mare740766 +-SH mare on filly687 +-SH rape whistle5 +-SH rapeface1178 +-SH scene interpretation10884 +-SH ship:twidash5854 +-SH shipping254095 +-SH stranger danger253 +-SH twilest dashle43 +-SH twilight is a foal fiddler447 +-SH twilight sparkle (alicorn)149092 +-SH whistle1717 +-SH younger22841
Loading...
Loading...
I agree that you aren’t obliged to an explanation for what you claim. But if what you claim is wrong or your reasoning is bad… then why would it surprise you that people point it out? That’s all I’m doing here. I’m pointing out your bad reasoning for a claim you decided to make.
And honestly, I’m pretty interested in the claim you made. I want to know if what you’re saying is actually true, so I’d be pretty happy to take a good look at whatever it is you think you found.
Obviously, whether or not you want to do that is totally up to you. But, again, I figured you cared whether or not what you believed was actually justified by good reasoning. Correct me if I’m wrong, and you just want to believe in whatever makes you happy. That’s fine too.
Sure, but I actually am interested. So, if you are up to having an idea discussed and likely criticized, please share. Again, totally up to you.
And that’s exactly why I didn’t just say it was assumption without providing a reason why. If you disagree with those reasons, I’d love to hear your thoughts on that.
Preferably in a forum post or a PM as opposed to this image, though. I’ve crowded this image enough with long posts already.
That doesn’t mean I try to convince or to persuade someone. I just mentioned what I found out. This is nothing that makes it necessary for me to give an explanation. I don’t owe that and I’m not obliged to do that.
If I give such an explanation depends on it if I want to. But, rest assured, if Princess Tuna would have expressed her sincere interest in what I mean exactly, I would have gladly linked her to the journal entry where I explained everything after the respective episode aired.
But if I get a snotty answer like “Assumptions! ASSUMPTIONS!!!!” then I don’t feel like giving this explanation and won’t give it.
Sure!
Still going to point out shitty logic when I see it though =D
Ridiculous ideas, by definition, deserve ridicule.
@CMC Scootaloo
Bronies, Bronies, you’re both beautiful. Now can’t we just get along and enjoy this interception of Twilight having her semi-pedo moment from the finale?
You made an argument to someone else, and even used the word “therefore” as though it was in logical structure. So you were seemingly trying to convince them of something.
However, since your premises were unsound, and your conclusion was fallacious, I tried to point those flaws out to you since they make your position extremely unconvincing. I guess I figured you cared whether your positions were justified or not.
Where did I say I’m trying to persuade you?
Did you get to the end of my response where I specifically said that I absolutely love this type of content? I’m not grossed out by the idea of foal fiddling at all. That’s why I said I love it… I thought that would make it pretty clear that I’m not opposed to the idea.
But just because I’m for the idea, doesn’t mean I won’t point out what I feel is shitty logic when I see it. That’s why I labeled each of your points with what was wrong with them, in addition to explaining why I thought they were bad points.
So, no. I’m not grossed out by the idea.
Really? So even when I ask you to point me in the direction of the evidence you are referring to that supposedly supports your point, you just refuse to do it and vaguely refer to it again anyway?
That’s extremely childish. Why not just show me what you’re talking about to prove me wrong? What good does it do to assume I won’t change my mind (despite me trying to demonstrate that I’m a reasonable person and try and use logic to the best of my abilities)?
You mean by pointing out your fallacies and bad arguments, of which you have not responded to and refuted in anyway, this demonstrates that I am unable to analyze a piece of evidence that you refuse to reveal?
I highly recommend you study some logic 101. It will vastly help you persuade others who disagree with your position, as opposed to merely convincing others that you have no idea how to have a conversation with someone who disagrees with you. =\
Upon analyzing your comment, I can already clearly see that you just judge what I said as “shitty logic” because you are grossed out by the imagination that sex is not limited in Equestria and even allowed for foals, so there is no point in explaining you why that is the case and how the show just recently very subtly (as much as it can do without having the show’s creators and Hasbro being skinned alive by moral guardians of our society) confirmed it.
Also, by the way you express yourself, I don’t expect you to being able to do deep analyzis on Equestria and to understand the explanation anyway.
Assumption. How could you possibly know what sex is like in the MLP universe? Please direct me to the episode that goes over that lore.
Assumption. Why wouldn’t it make a difference if a random stranger decided to start fondling a foal? Why do you think everyone would be just totally okay with that before knowing the pony’s intentions? Obviously bad ponies exist in this universe, so why assume nothing bad could possibly happen if this random pony decided to start fondling a foal?
Non-sequitur. How have you established that you know Rainbow Dash couldn’t possibly mind being touched that way by a stranger? Your statements have nothing to do with this conclusion you randomly arrived at.
So I agree with the post pointing out that you make way too many assumptions.
It’s funny because I’m actually totally in love with foalcon, and love this type of content. But I gotta point out shitty logic where I see it. =(
LOL
Hello, police, I want to report an imaginary fantasy horse having sex with an other imaginary fantasy horse!
What do you mean, does the nurse know i’m using the clinic’s phone without permission and what medicines are you referring to? ;-)
Are we still calling Starlight Glimmer a SJW? When we have Fury Belle? Seriously?
All of them or just more than one? XD
Well, SJWs have recently been called out for their rampant support of paedophiles.
Or you are upset over it that sex is socially accepted in Equestria even for foals (= children). That seems more likely.
@Background Pony #6397
^
“Make New Friends but Keep Discord” even very subtly confirmed the theory of love being universal in Equestria, in every form and shape, that I had since last year’s Summer.
anyone who would stand in the way of Twi getting dat sweet sweet filly poon
The Patriarchy.
Twilight Sparkle: An unabashed pedophile who supports bullying and loves crushing ponies’ dreams.
Starlight Glimmer: Supporter of Liberty, Equality, and Brotherhood. Just wants everyone to get along.
So who’s the real villain here?