When a plushy is in the washing machine

hope her down part is still fine

@Officer Hotpants  
First rule of Russian Mob. Do not talk about Russian Mob.

why tho

@Officer Hotpants  
The Russian Mob is actually just clothes that take control of the people wearing them. Not to be confused with the very different Russian Mop.

@GryusMechanum  
I thought that was the Russian mob.

In soviet Russia, you do not throw clothes in washing machine. Clothes throw YOU in washing machine.

She is the undisputed leader of all of Equestria
 
She could demand the finest baths in Canterlot at a moments notice
 
Yet, she does not
 
She is not that kind of princess
 
She will happily bathe in a washing machine
 
She is a nice princess

luna: walks in and sees celestia and walks off why did i return from the moon

@Chocolots  
But there wasn’t any ammonia in there before she went in…

Aw, not again! I gotta stop adding bleach with ammonia in my washing machine.

Is this the new episode of Budget Bathing?

@Cirrus Light  
@Solitude  
These days most apologists go with something to the effect of “he’s maximally powerful within the bounds of rationality” or “he’s the most powerful being in existence, beyond the potential of anything in his creation”. It’s their way of sidestepping the obvious paradoxes that arise from saying he can literally do anything.

@Solitude  
But then the answer is “He can’t” because it’s still a boulder He can lift…
 
Oh, cool, I have a Maud tag now…

@Cirrus Light  

 
Huh. That explains the Monty Python thing.  

 
I thought the standard answer was “he can, and then he lifts it anyway.” on the count of being omnipotent meaning logical restraints kinda fall by the wayside.

@Cirrus Light
 
I’m not going to read that and assume that your reply is “That’s not true”.

@iluvdawubz  
#NotallChristians
 
Actually, I remember reading somewhere that God’s name actually implies that he’s a self-existant entity, Jehovah, or as he introduced himself to Moses, “I AM.”
 
This also ties to a point where the Pharisees were questioning him, and they made some remark about being descendants of Abraham (prestigious position) and he replied, “before Abraham was, I am,” which was considered a high blasphemy because they had, by tradition, misinterpreted a mosaic law that uttering “Jehovah” outside of circumstances was punishable by death.
 

 
In studying General Relativity, something of great interest I’ve come across quite a bit is a causal loop, or “closed timelike curve”. There are a number of paradoxes that can arise, but the relevant one is this: let’s say there’s a wormhole sitting on a table with a mouth on each side, and a ball is sitting in the middle named Steve with a timer on it. You start the timer, when suddenly, despite still being on the table, untouched, Steve rolls out of one of the mouths with a timer reading “3 seconds”, knocking the Steve with 1 on his timer into the wormhole. Steve then emerges from the other side, a few seconds in the past, to knock himself into the wormhole.
 
What caused the collision? Well, the ball hit itself. Why? Because it got knocked into itself, so it went through and hit. Why? Because it hit itself…
 
It’s a self-causing event.
 
Likewise, a deep inspection of the Judeochristian God would seem to imply a self-existant being. He exists because He does.
 
But hey, conservation laws would imply that mass-energy is the same way. It always has existed and always will. Just kind of does.
 

 
But there are a lot of things wrong with the classic mainstream idea of the Christian God, though. If truly omnipotent, can He make a boulder so heavy He can’t lift it? Logic dictates some sort of restrictions imposed by a self-consistent reality, whatever they may be.
 
Digging into my own, Mormon, theology, though, you get questions like; what, if any, is the difference in-between something someone can’t do and wouldn’t do?
 
I could go on. It’s a deep topic with a surprising number of scriptural references.

@Cirrus Light
 
Just as logical as Christians saying that god created himself.

@iluvdawubz  
Lol, I know, but I like my interpretation of the comment.
 

@Cirrus Light
 
Facepalm
 
They BOTH like taking baths in washers. That’s what I’m saying, its a coincidence that the both share that.

@iluvdawubz  
Being Celestia’s daughter is a hobby?

@Background Pony #56BF
 
Maybe they just share the same hobbies?

@Background Pony #56BF  
Headcanon: Derpy is Celestia’s illegitimate daughter, and only Celestia knows.

Further evidence that she and Derpy are related: >>298386

Celestia sees washing machines as her personal baths, and finds it odd (and very flattering) that humans all seem to keep baths for her in their homes.