Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
My Little Ties crafts shop

Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!

Description

No description provided.

suggestive190724 artist:tomatocoup349 bow hothoof1418 windy whistles2896 pegasus496483 pony1602482 g42028890 and that's how rainbow dash was made48 awww228 bed57780 blushing274103 chest fluff65547 cowgirl position10069 cute265747 dilf452 duo169926 eyes closed138972 female1802687 flag5637 freckles43881 good clean married sex2117 heart76352 husband and wife2373 male550707 mare741033 married741 married couple1713 married couples doing married things548 married life108 milf13334 rainbow dash's parents385 sex171617 ship:windyhoof377 shipping254155 simple background596335 softcore3818 spread wings94515 stallion195681 straight179082 unshorn fetlocks46769 white background161790 windybetes310 wing hands2977 wing hold693 wingboner9653

Comments

Syntax quick reference: **bold** *italic* ||hide text|| `code` __underline__ ~~strike~~ ^sup^ %sub%

Detailed syntax guide

Background Pony #903D
In North America, “Rooting for you” means “Cheering for you.”
In New Zealand, “Root” means “Fuck.”
Bow and Windy seem to put both together.
Trick Question
Magical Inkwell - Wrote MLP fanfiction consisting of at least around 1.5k words, and has a verified link to the platform of their choice

@Mooniedrop  
The comments I replied to were comments directed at me personally. I’m just slow at responding sometimes.
 
@Darth Sonic  
There aren’t any current studies because the “research” you’re quoting is bunk, and there isn’t any evidence to impel more research in that direction.
 
All I’m trying to point out is that the veracity of your sources is important. It has to be scientific to be scientific.
Trick Question
Magical Inkwell - Wrote MLP fanfiction consisting of at least around 1.5k words, and has a verified link to the platform of their choice

@Background Pony #4319  
@Mooniedrop  
It’s not ‘which institutions’, it’s whether or not a study passes peer review. The peer review system is designed to filter out unscientific garbage.
 
Here’s an actual scientific study from 1975: http://www.jstor.org/stable/583035
 
Things have improved substantially since then because the topic is no longer nearly as taboo now as it was 42 years ago. There aren’t a lot of research studies on the topic, however, because it’s not a common situation and there isn’t substantial evidence that it produces any specific difficulty in child-rearing or other family dynamics. So no, the assertion that “people in open marriages have problems” is inaccurate—and even if it weren’t, saying it in that way is prejudicial toward those of us (like me) who live in an open marriage and have no problems in our relationship at all.
Mooniedrop

@TricksterWolf  
what instituitions collate statistics that are acceptable to you? im pretty sure everyone can no-platform an opponents source of statistics. its pretty easy, after all, you just did it without expending even 20 calories and providing zero proof.
Background Pony #E4FA
@TricksterWolf  
Please provide a link to a credible publication then. Everything I happen to find comes from seemingly biased (one way or the other) sources.