Uploaded by PonyQuarantine
2700x1500 PNG 714 kBInterested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
No description provided.
Tags
+-SH safe2176472 +-SH artist:pony quarantine1530 +-SH oc948614 +-SH oc only688907 +-SH oc:amber rose (thingpone)430 +-SH oc:thingpone477 +-SH semi-anthro22586 +-SH 3 panel comic432 +-SH argument in the comments99 +-SH arm hooves17341 +-SH bed57901 +-SH blank flank9964 +-SH body horror1941 +-SH claw298 +-SH clothes635412 +-SH crying55538 +-SH cute266048 +-SH cute little fangs3398 +-SH eldritch abomination1029 +-SH fangs40177 +-SH hairband2036 +-SH offended105 +-SH offscreen character52392 +-SH rest in peace441 +-SH shirt40533 +-SH speech bubble39509 +-SH standing25117 +-SH tentacles15517 +-SH text89761
Source
not provided yet
Loading...
Loading...
@Kamazeustra
@chucklefarts
Makes sense.
Then everyone on here is Furry
Nah, not getting annexed by the furry subculture, thank you.
You’re here on this site, that’s evidence enough.
Dude thinks I masturbate to National Geographic, for thinking I like Anthro art makes me a furry when it doesn’t. Because he doesn’t have evidence that I am one lol
That is too much to put in to one comment!
What episode???
Alright 👍 but you replied back :|
And I just watch the episode.. You’re gross dude
Edited
Instead of necroing a 2 year old image that’s making fun of furries on a furry website to complain about what furries are and whether or not you yourself are a furry, maybe you should go find someone who wants to talk to you about what you do to yourself while watching animals on National Geographic. That seems like a significantly better use of everyone’s time.
Favoriting Anthro images makes me Furry? I guess watching National Geographic showing a documentary about animals makes me Furry too?
You’re on a furry image on a furry booru talking about how you can like furry porn without being a furry because you’re not a furry and no one can prove that you are a furry just because you have publicly faved hundreds of anthro porn images on a furry site.
Got any proof I’m a furry?
Sounds like the kind of thing a self-loathing furry in denial would say.
Edited
But I dislike furries lol. Nice try
Sounds like the kind of thing a furry would say.
Um no. You can like the porn without being a furry… Its the samething as people calling mlp woke which is not true
gonna need more context for that XD
Glass houses.
Apparently XD he necro’d an olllld post I did way back.
And yet, you’re the one who claimed that sexually interested bronies are just furries, implying that anyone from ‘ooh horse, I wanna fuck it!’ to ‘species boundaries don’t exist for me’ are considered the same as Furries, also making your prime link between them sexual in nature, and if they’re connected to being ‘furry’ by sexual interest, then that’d mean that people who ‘do furry things’ but aren’t sexual about it, aren’t actually furries by that interpretation.
just because people seem to lack the ability to just make different words instead of saying ‘oh, this word means what I say it means, not what the world says it means’ XD
And I mean, you only specified ‘furries’, as the broad generalization that you’re treating it as [neverminding that you’re generalizing even harder by lumping non-furry things in as furry], that lumps the best with the worst, and the barely if at all related with the perfectly definition fitting, so there’s little point in worrying about separating the public exposure criminals from the casual fur-suiters. If you consider a definitively dissimilar fandom to be ‘furry’, Then it just makes you sound like a hypocrite to have an issue with a much more closely related comparison.
Also, reputations are built by the more notorious, so my statement is still accurate. xD
Edited
Apparently. Blame it on me, yo.
@Background Pony #04A4
I did lay it out like that, yes, but that’s also not what grooming is. Also, by that logic, by lumping all furries into the same sexual-deviant category, you paint a rather horrid picture of our own fandom. Because the rest of the internet isn’t very thrilled with us either.
Not all furries go around molesting each other in fursuits, just like not all bronies are into the show just because of the porn. Generalizations like that are poisonous to both the fandoms and the people making the generalizations.
Hell if I know… something about trying to define all sexual interest in non human beings as inherently associated with the group that has a reputation of spontaneous public orgies that get them banned if not arrested, and getting caught fucking actual animals?
How is this grooming? You can’t just spout random nonsense and not explain why.