@GreenestTea  
It’s -422 now. Your argument is invalid.

@GreenestTea  
now -421

@PacificGreen  
Still 420

@GreenestTea  
Technically the score and not the number of downvotes.

Can we stop arguing for a second and notice the 420 Downvotes.
 
 
Hahahah, weed joke, heh.

 
Typical Westboro Baptist Church propaganda

@He-Man  
Wonder if it merits the Poe’s Law tag?

I honestly can’t tell if the is serious.

amen

@Millennial Dan  
There was-and still is-A LOT of scrutiny towards homosexuality, I’m not gay myself, but I believe someone should be allowed to love whoever they want, AND NOT be ostracized or alienated for something… unorthodox.

@Gakell  
Safe? That right was already afforded to everyone.

literally, fuck you.
 
All these bills do, is prevent discrimination within the system.
 
LGBT people should not have to deal with this shit today, all we want is to have the same rights and same services as heterosexual people.
 
We aren’t out to DESTROY FAMILIES AND BABIES AND TERRORIZE YOUR LITTLE WORLD.
 
I shouldn’t have to stay in the closet for fear of being disowned and for fear of having someone assault me for who I am.
 
All we want, is to be safe.

And to think the most downvoted OC pic isn’t an Alicorn.
 
Also, thanks for the laughs, comment section.

@Background Pony #C3CA  
Pile it on all you like. I’m accustomed to seeing a lot of immaturity around here.

@Background Pony #2536  

@Background Pony #2536  
A childish taunt such as this is completely meaningless. Spiteful gloating reveals an infantile viewpoint that really has no place in political debate. No wonder things have gotten so bad.

@Millennial Dan  
I’m so glad you and your ilk lost .. and will keep losing. :)

@Background Pony #5B27  
Marriage itself isn’t something that was ever invented or defined by government. Their role has always been to recognize and protect what is already there, which is appropriate. Now, they’ve decided that activist judges, and not the people, can say what is or is not marriage. The argument has for many years now revolved around the legal perks that come with the government’s recognition of marriage, and those perks are privileges, not basic rights.

@DrNazus  
>top-right  
*top-left  
Wow

@Millennial Dan
 
Okay. What rights, further to those enjoyed by heterosexual people are being given? Are heterosexual people not also now free to marry someone of the same sex? That is your logic in saying “gay people had the same rights already”, after all.

@atalarikt  
Precisely.

@Millennial Dan  
Or to be exact, privileges.

@Background Pony #2536  
It’s not equal rights. It’s special rights.

@Millennial Dan  
It’s depressing that you’re trying to stand in the way of equal rights and our societies’ advancement.