Posts
Search Results
Site and Policy » Tag Implications » Post 1635
Joey
PM me your cute OCs
@Dogman15
@Joey
I discussed it with Derpibooru’s lead meme expert and another mod who is well-versed in meme sciences, and they recommended aliasing “firin mah lazor” into “shoop da whoop”, so that’s what we did.
Edit: I’ve been asked to amend this post to state that if you have questions about this, you may Click here to ask our leading Meme Expert
@Joey
I discussed it with Derpibooru’s lead meme expert and another mod who is well-versed in meme sciences, and they recommended aliasing “firin mah lazor” into “shoop da whoop”, so that’s what we did.
Edit: I’ve been asked to amend this post to state that if you have questions about this, you may Click here to ask our leading Meme Expert
Site and Policy » Tag Implications » Post 1634
Joey
PM me your cute OCs
@DragonWraith
Kinda pointless when they both have only one image each. If a tag becomes widely used, then an implication can be added as necessary.
@DragonWraith
Done
@Dogman15
I’ll ask about this. We have a few meme experts on staff, so they’ll know better than I would on that topic.
Kinda pointless when they both have only one image each. If a tag becomes widely used, then an implication can be added as necessary.
@DragonWraith
Done
@Dogman15
I’ll ask about this. We have a few meme experts on staff, so they’ll know better than I would on that topic.
Art Chat » removing pics » Post 3
Joey
PM me your cute OCs
Vree does not have the ability to delete images from this site.
One of Jon’s recent images (and a few variants of it) was removed due to Rule #5.2, as the image was sexual in nature and the age of the characters being questionable. We hate deleting images, but the site is based in a country where the laws are a bit strict on that topic, so it’s always better safe than sorry, unfortunately.
But no, we’re not deleting his artwork. It was just one image in particular, due to reasons a bit beyond our control.
One of Jon’s recent images (and a few variants of it) was removed due to Rule #5.2, as the image was sexual in nature and the age of the characters being questionable. We hate deleting images, but the site is based in a country where the laws are a bit strict on that topic, so it’s always better safe than sorry, unfortunately.
But no, we’re not deleting his artwork. It was just one image in particular, due to reasons a bit beyond our control.
Art Chat » [SFW] Artist's Group Chat » Post 510
Joey
PM me your cute OCs
You can add artist tags to your watch list - this is nothing new at all, and has been a feature for as long as I can remember.
There’s just been a lot of demand for artists to be able to know how many people watch their tags, so a count was added that’s visible to the artist only as to how many people watch their tag. A actual list of who watches the tag probably will never happen though, due to privacy reasons.
There’s just been a lot of demand for artists to be able to know how many people watch their tags, so a count was added that’s visible to the artist only as to how many people watch their tag. A actual list of who watches the tag probably will never happen though, due to privacy reasons.
General Discussion » You laugh, you lose. » Post 9697
Site and Policy » Tag Aliases - Read the first page before suggesting. » Post 2818
Joey
PM me your cute OCs
EmberSpike wins, all other names have been aliased into that.
@Solitude
What was the name she was called in the episode?
@Solitude
@DragonWraith
Done
@Solitude
What was the name she was called in the episode?
@Solitude
@DragonWraith
Done
Site and Policy » Spike x Ember shipping tag voting. » Post 28
Joey
PM me your cute OCs
It seems the bulk of the votes are for EmberSpike, so the other ship names have been aliased into that.
Generals » We need to elect users to keep this forum in check. » Post 91
Joey
PM me your cute OCs
@The Green Meanie
>Accusing me of not doing research
>Has no idea best background pony is a pegasus
>>808352 (porn-ish)
>Accusing me of not doing research
>Has no idea best background pony is a pegasus
>>808352 (porn-ish)
Site and Policy » Feature suggestions and discussion [READ THE FIRST POST] » Post 2363
Joey
How about just adding it to the profile page, where it’s just another stat on the tags themselves:
(inb4 comment about light theme)
@liamwhite1
I am!
PM me your cute OCs
The question is which page
How about just adding it to the profile page, where it’s just another stat on the tags themselves:
(inb4 comment about light theme)
@liamwhite1
and are the other mods all okay with this?
I am!
Site and Policy » Feature suggestions and discussion [READ THE FIRST POST] » Post 2357
Joey
PM me your cute OCs
@InLucidReverie
Seconded!
Though I’d prefer it just private info for the “owner” of that tag, instead of public knowledge.
Seconded!
Though I’d prefer it just private info for the “owner” of that tag, instead of public knowledge.
Generals » We need to elect users to keep this forum in check. » Post 82
Joey
PM me your cute OCs
Vote for Joey! Because I’m the only mod shitposting here who actually has a pony avatar!
Site and Policy » Tag Implications » Post 1626
Joey
PM me your cute OCs
@Rainboom Dash
I looked up that name before replying, and it said that the name has been used on multiple pieces of Berry Punch merchandise. If it’s legitimately used only for unicorn berry punch in merchandise, then it can be removed
I looked up that name before replying, and it said that the name has been used on multiple pieces of Berry Punch merchandise. If it’s legitimately used only for unicorn berry punch in merchandise, then it can be removed
Site and Policy » "Offspring" images » Post 4
Joey
PM me your cute OCs
@SuperSupermario24
Easier said than done due to tag implications. If you tag an image as TwiDash, then the system automatically tags it as “lesbian, rainbow dash, shipping, twilight sparkle” as well. Plus if there is no TwiDash shipping in the image, I feel it’s not appropriate for that tag to apply.
@DanielTepesKraus
I’d have to disagree with this. The entire idea behind tagging is that if you want to see pictures of Minuette, then you should only have to type “Minuette”, and then only see pictures that contain Minuette.
I don’t feel that it would be reasonable to tell people “Oh, if you want to only see pictures that contain Twilight, then you have to exclude ~~offspring”. That would set a bad precedent, that can only expand from there.
For example, what if someone starts tagging all screencaps of Tara Strong’s Twitter account as Twilight Sparkle, since Tara is arguably Twilight? The same logic applies since it’s related to Twilight, but Twilight isn’t in the picture. And then people wanting to search for pictures that contain Twilight Sparkle would need to search for “twilight sparkle, -offspring, -tara strong, -twitter”. Plus as @SuperSupermario24 said ~~ that will end up hiding images that legit contain Twilight Sparkle.
Most importantly though, which is the exception? I would imagine there’s a magnitude of people who are interested in pictures of Pinkie Pie than there are of some made up offspring OC of hers. So why should the majority have to be inconvenienced and start negating tags in their searches?
I think an overall better solution would be to use the “Implied <x>” tags. for example, a picture of an OC that the artist purports to be Twilight and Rainbow’s child, but doesn’t feature those characters in there, would be better tagged as “implied twilight sparkle, implied rainbow dash, implied twidash”. That’s contextually a lot more accurate, and doesn’t cause oc-only images to appear in searches that they don’t belong in.
Easier said than done due to tag implications. If you tag an image as TwiDash, then the system automatically tags it as “lesbian, rainbow dash, shipping, twilight sparkle” as well. Plus if there is no TwiDash shipping in the image, I feel it’s not appropriate for that tag to apply.
@DanielTepesKraus
I’d have to disagree with this. The entire idea behind tagging is that if you want to see pictures of Minuette, then you should only have to type “Minuette”, and then only see pictures that contain Minuette.
I don’t feel that it would be reasonable to tell people “Oh, if you want to only see pictures that contain Twilight, then you have to exclude ~~offspring”. That would set a bad precedent, that can only expand from there.
For example, what if someone starts tagging all screencaps of Tara Strong’s Twitter account as Twilight Sparkle, since Tara is arguably Twilight? The same logic applies since it’s related to Twilight, but Twilight isn’t in the picture. And then people wanting to search for pictures that contain Twilight Sparkle would need to search for “twilight sparkle, -offspring, -tara strong, -twitter”. Plus as @SuperSupermario24 said ~~ that will end up hiding images that legit contain Twilight Sparkle.
Most importantly though, which is the exception? I would imagine there’s a magnitude of people who are interested in pictures of Pinkie Pie than there are of some made up offspring OC of hers. So why should the majority have to be inconvenienced and start negating tags in their searches?
I think an overall better solution would be to use the “Implied <x>” tags. for example, a picture of an OC that the artist purports to be Twilight and Rainbow’s child, but doesn’t feature those characters in there, would be better tagged as “implied twilight sparkle, implied rainbow dash, implied twidash”. That’s contextually a lot more accurate, and doesn’t cause oc-only images to appear in searches that they don’t belong in.
Site and Policy » Tag Implications » Post 1621
Joey
PM me your cute OCs
@Kappe
I’m not trying to be smart or rude or anything. I’m just lazy as hell and don’t want to go searching for posts made sometime in the past. I’ll ask the other mods about this and see what their opinions are.
@Rainboom Dash
She has multiple canon names, so usually we just imply each name to one another in those situations.
@tvc
Done.
I’m not trying to be smart or rude or anything. I’m just lazy as hell and don’t want to go searching for posts made sometime in the past. I’ll ask the other mods about this and see what their opinions are.
@Rainboom Dash
She has multiple canon names, so usually we just imply each name to one another in those situations.
@tvc
Done.
Site and Policy » Tag Aliases - Read the first page before suggesting. » Post 2793
Joey
PM me your cute OCs
@CodeLuxor
@Solitude
Done
@Yoshimon1
There aren’t any images tagged under “artist:misspiesmonsters” - I can’t alias tags that don’t exist :P
I would imagine anyway that most people would realize that’s the name of the blog, not the artist. There’s usually not too much confusion about artist tags when it comes to such blogs.
@Solitude
Done
@Yoshimon1
There aren’t any images tagged under “artist:misspiesmonsters” - I can’t alias tags that don’t exist :P
I would imagine anyway that most people would realize that’s the name of the blog, not the artist. There’s usually not too much confusion about artist tags when it comes to such blogs.
Showing results 3301 - 3325 of 3623 total
Default search
If you do not specify a field to search over, the search engine will search for posts with a body that is similar to the query's word stems. For example, posts containing the words winged humanization
, wings
, and spread wings
would all be found by a search for wing
, but sewing
would not be.
Allowed fields
Field Selector | Type | Description | Example |
---|---|---|---|
author | Literal | Matches the author of this post. Anonymous authors will never match this term. | author:Joey |
body | Full Text | Matches the body of this post. This is the default field. | body:test |
created_at | Date/Time Range | Matches the creation time of this post. | created_at:2015 |
id | Numeric Range | Matches the numeric surrogate key for this post. | id:1000000 |
my | Meta | my:posts matches posts you have posted if you are signed in. | my:posts |
subject | Full Text | Matches the title of the topic. | subject:time wasting thread |
topic_id | Literal | Matches the numeric surrogate key for the topic this post belongs to. | topic_id:7000 |
topic_position | Numeric Range | Matches the offset from the beginning of the topic of this post. Positions begin at 0. | topic_position:0 |
updated_at | Date/Time Range | Matches the creation or last edit time of this post. | updated_at.gte:2 weeks ago |
user_id | Literal | Matches posts with the specified user_id. Anonymous users will never match this term. | user_id:211190 |
forum | Literal | Matches the short name for the forum this post belongs to. | forum:meta |