uc9
Side note:
Oh for fucks sakes news can’t you for once get what you’re citing correct? Does anyone else know who nate silver is? Well the news is citing him again, but they’re not even quoting him right. This time it has to do with the 2014 elections; short version is ten tossup seats and that on average each party has a 25% chance of taking each seat with the remaining percentage being unclear, but the news just jumped the gun again. They’re saying the gop will win one billion billion seats or that democrats will win a trillion trillion seats.
I’m annoyed cause they can’t even get basic fucking third grade level math right.
I feel as though if you sat a 24/7 news anchor down in front a third grade math test and the teacher asked them, “Okay if you have a hundred seats and someone takes fifty how many do you have left?” chances are the news anchor would respond with, “A gagillion!”
Well natalia found out she’s popular on the internet:
Corrupter of the pure
Side note:
Oh for fucks sakes news can’t you for once get what you’re citing correct? Does anyone else know who nate silver is? Well the news is citing him again, but they’re not even quoting him right. This time it has to do with the 2014 elections; short version is ten tossup seats and that on average each party has a 25% chance of taking each seat with the remaining percentage being unclear, but the news just jumped the gun again. They’re saying the gop will win one billion billion seats or that democrats will win a trillion trillion seats.
I’m annoyed cause they can’t even get basic fucking third grade level math right.
I feel as though if you sat a 24/7 news anchor down in front a third grade math test and the teacher asked them, “Okay if you have a hundred seats and someone takes fifty how many do you have left?” chances are the news anchor would respond with, “A gagillion!”
Well natalia found out she’s popular on the internet: