Background Pony #52BA
@icicle wicicle 1517
It’s significant in the sense that it’s a common screen and video size, like 4k (which itself had some questions asked that I don’t remember getting answered) and to a lesser extent 8k and 5k.
It’s significant in the sense that it’s a common screen and video size, like 4k (which itself had some questions asked that I don’t remember getting answered) and to a lesser extent 8k and 5k.
However, because the site has for a while supported searching by image dimensions, pixel count, and aspect ratio, it’s redundant - though potentially a useful shortcut for people less search-syntax-savvy or for quick inclusion in watchlists or filters. In other words, I find it unnecessary but I could understand how other people might want it.
[edit] It is completely redundant with 1080p - even though technically that only depends on vertical pixel count, nobody ever uses it to mean anything other than 1920x1080.
I proposed a feature suggestion about a year ago to automatically handle basic image data as tags - tags like absurd file size, png, gif, 16:9, etc.