Posts

For more information, see the search syntax documentation. Search results are sorted by creation date.

Search Results

Tagging Discussion » [NSFW] The "circumcised" tagging » Post 1

LightningBolt
Umbrella - For Patreon supporters
Lightning Dee - Derpi Supporter
Pixel Perfection - I still call her Lightning Bolt
Silly Pony - Celebrated the 13th anniversary of MLP:FIM, and 40 years of MLP!
Shimmering Smile - Celebrated the 10th anniversary of Equestria Girls!
Lunar Hero - Went above and beyond in the name of Lunar freedom, they will be remembered in legends and folklore as paragons of heroism for generations (April Fools 2023).
Flower Trio - Helped others get their OC into the 2023 Derpibooru Collab.
Roseluck - Had their OC in the 2023 Derpibooru Collab.
Chaotic Little Trees - 1000+ images under their artist tag
King Sombra - Celebrated the 10th anniversary of The Crystal Empire!

Senior Moderator
Undead inside
While it may sound like nepotism, I make erect penises with or without foreskin look exactly the same, a simplified cartoony style need not anymore detail, only adding that detail in flaccid or semi-flaccid.
But yeah, I do agree, should only be tagged if it is 100% explicit.

Tagging Discussion » [NSFW] The "circumcised" tagging » Topic Opener

Background Pony #4B09
It’s a question about all the images tagged: circumcised
How do we know, that those erect penises are actually circumcised?
If they are soft, it’s more likely (though a foreskin can still be retracted over glans).
But, when they are erect, it’s actually quite common for uncircumcised penises to have their foreskin fully retracted behind the enlarged glans (depending on a person of course). And yes, I can vouch for that, since I’ve seen real ones that were non-circumcised.
So, unless it’s tagged that way by an artist, is it really correct for people to add that tag to all such images, which could actually be as well uncircumcised?
Example images / GIFs:
Yes, an erect uncircumcised penis can look that way (depending on individual’s foreskin and glans size).
I personally think, that such tags shouldn’t be added by others, if an artist didn’t specify it, when there’s often no actual way to tell the difference between two types, when erect.
What do you all think?

Default search

If you do not specify a field to search over, the search engine will search for posts with a body that is similar to the query's word stems. For example, posts containing the words winged humanization, wings, and spread wings would all be found by a search for wing, but sewing would not be.

Allowed fields

Field SelectorTypeDescriptionExample
authorLiteralMatches the author of this post. Anonymous authors will never match this term.author:Joey
bodyFull TextMatches the body of this post. This is the default field.body:test
created_atDate/Time RangeMatches the creation time of this post.created_at:2015
idNumeric RangeMatches the numeric surrogate key for this post.id:1000000
myMetamy:posts matches posts you have posted if you are signed in. my:posts
subjectFull TextMatches the title of the topic.subject:time wasting thread
topic_idLiteralMatches the numeric surrogate key for the topic this post belongs to.topic_id:7000
topic_positionNumeric RangeMatches the offset from the beginning of the topic of this post. Positions begin at 0.topic_position:0
updated_atDate/Time RangeMatches the creation or last edit time of this post.updated_at.gte:2 weeks ago
user_idLiteralMatches posts with the specified user_id. Anonymous users will never match this term.user_id:211190
forumLiteralMatches the short name for the forum this post belongs to.forum:meta