General Tag Discussion

What exactly is badonkadonk about that’s different from ass?

@Background Pony #A8E1  
Perhaps one way to illustrate the difference is to ask Tara Strong to demonstrate for you the hip-notizing nature of the Badonk adonk.

And, just in case additional evidence is necessary
 
2LDW: Everyone has an ass. But badonk adonks are rare.

@Ciaran  
@Ciaran  
So, “ass, but just assier”? There’s already a tag for wide hip / bountiful arse focus…

@saby  
If you are not a fan of the badonk adonk, or can’t see it’s glory, then it’s hard to describe what you are missing.
 
It’s like trying to describe “bacon” to a vegetarian.

@ice1517  

 
The long one is destroyed now.
 
 
@mav  

 
IMO the spoiler:x tags should be reserved for pony stuff. I’m talking to other staff about a concensus. Even the pony spoiler tags get aliased to their episode names after a year or so.
 
 
@ice1517  

 
Seems like a mistake. I’m going to remove it later unless someone fesses up.
 
 
@saby  

 
I get your frustration. There is an art pack:badonkadonk which I just aliased. Maybe those were the source of the original badonkadonk tag and people just started tagging it?

badonkadonk is better than the ass was fat, and has been in common usage for decades.

Is there a way to filter out all saucy pics like this one?  
>>1763234  
All the tags associated with these kind of butt-seduction-only pics feel too broad, and might have a high chance of raising false positives imo.

@Background Pony #EE55  

 
?

@LightningBolt  
That’s pretty effective. Thanks a lot.

@Background Pony #EE55  
np

@Binkyt11  
lmao, seriously
 
What the actual
 
Wow

@Rainboom Dash  
Well the pony in the first picture is presenting and very deliberately spreading their legs. Suggestive poses and gestures are enough for a non-safe rating tag here.

@saby  
Heh, true
 
People here are very sensitive

@Rainboom Dash  
Yes unfortunately.
 
@saby  
Well it was supposed to be something like this:  

 
It was never supposed to be lewd in the first place.

@Binkyt11  
Well, it did.

@Binkyt11
 
I now see it…
 
@Dogman15
 
Well, it wasn’t supposed to look lewd, and it coming of as such, can be explained by ones mind expecting to see lewd things…to a kid, it most probably won’t look lowed, but remind them of their pet/friend’s pet.
 
But YMMV.

@Binkyt11  
Well, I changed it back to safe a while back
 
Because it isn’t suggestive… There’s things way more suggestive on this site that aren’t mistagged they just.. aren’t enough to be tagged suggestive
 
That’s how tame that image was
 

 
But.. suggestive is subjective and heeeey… Anyone can change tags on here
 
There was some image on here where Applejack was looking back in a non-seductive way with her rear facing the view in a non-suggestive way and it got changed to suggestive.. I of course changed it back but I guess it’s all so subjective so who knows maybe it is suggestive
 
It’s all so confusing because it’s so subjective…
 
 
Okay, so… I guess I could see how this could be interpreted as suggestive >>1734713 but I’m just not really seeing it..
 
So.. I guess I could see how it happened.. I mean, that’s kind of what I guess sometimes before… You know..
 
I don’t think the pic was meant to be suggestive at all but.. I guess that doesn’t matter when it comes to ratings… At the time I didn’t see anything suggestive to it at all but… Meh… Why am I even debating this so much… It’s subjective to a large extent
 
Now, that belly rub pic, fucking lol… Some people…

While, fairly old and I may have forgotten, I still have to wonder how the decision came to be with Tootsie Flute, a show character nonetheless, got the “offspring:” thing whenever she is depicted with Lyra and Bon Bon anyway.

@EPPony  
It’s fanon

@Background Pony #EC55  
Yet the same doesn’t apply to other fanon offspring, like Dinky, Ruby Pinch, Lily Pad, Water Lily and others.

@EPPony  
Dunno what the deal is then  
Also, Lily Pad and Water Lily aren’t fanon offspring

@Background Pony #EC55  
From what I’ve seen, they’re usually depicted as such to Victoria.
 

@EPPony  
Because she’s actually their mother

Is this REALLY suggestive?
 
>>1763517
 
If it is then I am fucking done with tagging this shit because that’s ridiculous