General Tag Discussion

@Rainboom Dash  
Um, yes? Obviously?

@Ponylooker  
That’s what I thought… I just wasn’t sure the first one was really suggestive (but I’m not going to argue) which is why I was making sure the other 2 were even though it looked a lot more suggestive than the 1st one

@Ponylooker  
@Rainboom Dash  

The image was set safe by a moderator. It was retagged suggestive 20 minutes later by someone else.  
About a fifth of bikini pictures are tagged safe, and I think >>1772984 qualifies as well.

@Ponylooker  
@Rainboom Dash  
@Shayzorr  
Yeah, Those images would be Safe.

@Zeb  
The other 2 are safe?
 
But the breasts are so overly big… And slightly exposed

@Rainboom Dash  
Someone having large breasts in a bikini is something you can see everyday at a beach, and isn’t inherently sexually suggestive aside from people being able to find it sexy. Which is true of any character in a swimsuit.

@Zeb  
Yeah but what you can see at a beach (or a bra ad or a perfume ad or whatever) isn’t necessarily SFW. In this case (babes in bikinis) it’s quite clearly not SFW.

@Zeb  
Aren’t bikinis worn for a few specific reasons?  
Also, nude beaches?

@Background Pony #EC55  
This is absolutely correct. You can take children to nude beaches, but that doesn’t mean bare breasts or vulvas or penises should be tagged Safe here. The purpose of a bikini is to give sexual emphasis to women’s bodies, making them inherently suggestive. This is why you don’t want to see grandma in one. There are other swimsuits designed not to give sexual emphasis to the body, but bikinis are not among them.

I mean, I don’t even find breasts all that sexual and even I think that having a safe tag is quite odd
 
A lot of “babes in bikinis” at a beach would be suggestive here
 
There’s a lot of PG stuff out there in the real world that’s perfectly fine but here it would be ‘suggestive’
 
Or being able to see a animal’s privates
 
Sure… In the real world that’s perfectly fine but here it would be ‘explicit’

@Ponylooker
 
@Rainboom Dash
 
A bikini swimsuit by itself is not suggestive.

@Archonix  
Exactly. If you can show it on prime time TV, it’s “safe”.

 
Does this count as the dark humor described in the description of the ‘semi-grimdark’ tag?

@Derpy Whooves  
Understood. You will continue to be wrong; I will occasionally attempt to inject sanity; you will continue to hold power and not listen.

@Ponylooker  
Dude, let it go. It’s not worth it.
 
Edit: Derpy, and all other mods, I’m on your side.

@Ponylooker  
If you can show it on prime time TV, it’s safe for all audiences.
 
Just because it turns you on doesn’t mean that it should be rated in such a way that others can’t see it.
 
@Background Pony #EC55  
Please don’t do that. Just because you don’t agree with someone is no reason for you to behave like that toward them.

@Derpy Whooves  
I second this completely. People have been aroused by the artwork of My Little Pony. Not even anything that happened in it. Just the artwork. But, it’s still G-rated.

@Zaknel  
Humans have been aroused by chairs, lamps, and pies. We need to rate what’s actually in the image, not what people can imagine.

@Derpy Whooves  
It doesn’t even turn me on but I’ve seen images way less suggestive than that that have been rated suggestive… So that’s what I’m going by

@Rainboom Dash  
Which images?

@Rainboom Dash  
I’ve seen screencaps that were rated “Explicit” by the uploader. What’s your point?

Actually explicit or still questionable? >>1773413

@Yoshimon1  
It’s explicit because she’s already masturbating the other mare, there’s already the explicit act.
 
Questionable would be like here: >>857762 where without the act we can still “question” ourselves hehe.

@Zaknel  
>>1734713
 
sigh some people…
 
I changed it back to safe a long time ago but it was tagged suggestive at one point >_>