General Tag Discussion

@Ponylooker  
Doesn’t really look like it. Right now, I’m more caught up with trying to understand how either of those are distinct from Unguligrade anthro.

@Background Pony #F03E  
They are a subset of unguligrade anthro, but unguligrade anthro also contains >>1877762 and >>1884480.

@Ponylooker  
They seem redundant to me.

@Background Pony #F03E  
For both “hoof feet” and “short pastern”, the lowest section of the leg is shorter than most unguligrade anthro, about the length of a human foot. However, “short pastern” looks more as if they’re standing on their toes, whereas “hoof feet” is like a flat foot but with a hoof instead of toes at the end. I haven’t seen the “short pastern” tag before now though, so this is just a guess.  

@Litrojia  
Did you make that just now? Can you also upload it to Derpibooru? Or is it already here and the reverse image search can’t detect it?

@Dogman15  
I made that just then, but I didn’t directly upload it here since I wasn’t sure it was right and it’s pretty crude.

@Litrojia  
I think it’s correct. You should consider uploading it.

Does preening be considered as grooming as well as brushing?

There’s an error on the description of when she smiles.

@Background Pony #E373  
grooming maybe but not brushing.

sometimes i wonder why vulgar isn’t a rating. it always struck me as one (like a psuedo-rating i guess)

Would shocked be considered as surprised?

@Background Pony #E373  
Not sure if you can be happy shocked.

@Boulder318  
Well you can still be sad when you’re surprised. Like it said in the dictionary: “Shocked: cause(someone) to fell surprised and upset”

@Background Pony #E373  
Shocked I feel has only one value, Surprised there are so many happy, sad, angry, perplexed, etc.

@Boulder318  
So shocked should imply surprised. Also, maybe, busted?

does the description for kill it with fire still apply? because the meme makes up a small fraction of the tagged images and boy i know of some images that could use a good killing with fire.

@Shoto  

 
Absolutely do not use tags like that on images you dislike.

@LightningBolt  
alrighty, haha. i moreso meant bizarre creatures like the ones tagged on it right now ^^; like.. weird mega-fusions and interspecies children gone wrong. i didnt mean it that way, haha, i just worded that wrong

@Shoto  
It should not be on those, no.

@LightningBolt  
alright. thanks, can i remove them from the tag then?

@Shoto  
Yes.

can we make the description for polite cat this image lmao
 

 
also it should imply meme and :t

Was asked to post here, so:
 
For the blogs that are dead, is there a way to mass tag images with those blogs as the source with dead source?

@Background Pony #A8E1  
Staff has a mass tagging tool.