[NSFW] "Impossibly Large Breasts"

Tagging Discussion » [NSFW] "Impossibly Large Breasts" Search Posts
Background Pony #60EB
I understand if it’s like BadgerBen’s art where the breasts are twice the size of the entire body, but there are a lot of images tagged under it that actually are just larger-than-normal breasts.
 
If this can exist irl~  
full  
then it’s not “impossibly large”
patec
Perfect Pony Plot Provider - Uploader of 10+ images with 350 upvotes or more (Questionable/Explicit)
Cool Crow - "Caw!" An awesome tagger
Not a Llama - Happy April Fools Day!
Magnificent Metadata Maniac - #1 Assistant
Fine Arts - Two hundred uploads with a score of over a hundred (Safe/Suggestive)
The End wasn't The End - Found a new home after the great exodus of 2012

It’s one of those examples where it’s absolutely impossible to draw a clear line between “large” and “impossibly large”. It will always be subjective.
toxicitzi
BUY SOME APPLES! - Derpi Supporter
My Little Pony - 1992 Edition
Sapphire -
Happy Derpy! - For Patreon supporters

@Background Pony #F557  
I understand what you mean nd yes, in some cases it is horribly mistagged, but that’s the official problem here, subjectivity messing up with people.
 
the same sort of thing can and does happen to impossibly large derrieres.
WingbeatPony
Daring Do Dakimakura - Attended a Derpibooru panel at a MLP convention
Elements of Harmony - Had an OC in the 2022 Community Collab
Twinkling Balloon - Took part in the 2021 community collab.
My Little Pony - 1992 Edition
Wallet After Summer Sale -
Friendship, Art, and Magic (2019) - Celebrated Derpibooru's seventh year anniversary with friends.
Equality - In our state, we do not stand out.
Friendship, Art, and Magic (2018) - Celebrated Derpibooru's six year anniversary with friends.
Cool Crow - "Caw!" An awesome tagger
Birthday Cake - Celebrated MLP's 7th birthday

Tag horse
This is only a suggestion, but a way to give at least some guidance on where to draw the line might be:  
Breasts exaggerated to the point that they aren’t just abnormally large, they also look out of place on the body. In other words, something like >>1281569 would not be, since the character is so curvy, but that same breast size might qualify for the tag on an image like >>1204625 because of the mismatch. An exception could be made for cases where everything is exaggerated, but it would still have to qualify as looking “out of place” (that is, the body type itself is outside the realm of possibility).
 
I realize this is in no way less subjective, but it does at least give some framework for judging cases where the breasts take up less than 40% of the body mass. What do you think?
Oatsy
SMILE - Obsessed
Equality - In our state, we do not stand out.
Bronze Bit -
Sapphire -
Cool Crow - "Futa!" An awesome tagger
Not a Llama - Happy April Fools Day!
Happy Derpy! - For Patreon supporters
Magnificent Metadata Maniac - Someone's gotta fix all those futa images.
A Perfectly Normal Pony - <Oatmeal> "If her age is on the clock, she's old enough for cock."
The End wasn't The End - Found a new home after the great exodus of 2012

Sometimes Not Dead
@Background Pony #F557  
I’ve said the same thing before, many times. Like others said, the problem is subjectivity. The closest I ever got to a reasonable response was when I was pointing out Norma Stitz to someone and he was pointing out the girl in the picture may have had smaller breasts, but she was also much skinnier than Norma, so her tits would’ve been impossible for her frame.
 
Anecdote aside, it’s really not something we can fix without requiring artists to give measurements for all their characters or something (which I hope is obviously stupid.)
Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
The Travelling Pony Museum Shop!

Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!

This topic has been locked to new posts from non-moderators.

Locked

Lock reason: No actionable request