[NSFW] Are female nipples without breasts in crotch area still crotchboobs?

I uploaded this:  

 
and somebody added tag ““crotchboobs[](/tags/crotchboobs) to it even though there are no boobs, just nipples. As males who have nipples don’t have the tag “breast” to them, then I don’t think just the nipples would be enough to tag something with “crotchboobs” as it’s description is:  

 
The definition of “breast” from Miriam-Webster dictionary is:  

 
Nipples on bellies alone are not really “extending” from them too much.
 
 
More examples include:  

 
I am right to think, that “crotcboobs” would not apply here? Is there a tag for just the nipples drawn on female characters?

The crotchboobs also serves for people who want to filter anatomically correct horse breasts, as in having teats on their lower belly. So yes, I’d say the tag applies. People who like crotchboobs will also want to find that image under that tag, since even if they are flat, they are still boobs (as in female tits), and people who filter it won’t want to see it.
 
There’s a difference between strict definitions and the applicative uses of a word.

@ArmadilloEater  
Having human chesticles on horse groins are not ‘anatomically correct’. Teats is more for that.

@LightningBolt  
I just explained what I meant after that. Having any kind of fun bags between the thighs is considered “anatomically correct” to an extent. Some people don’t like that, some people do.
 
And yeah, for the realistic equine breasts we use teats, but those are still tagged crotchboobs. You don’t need to tell me, I’m the one that proposed that distinction >:T

@ArmadilloEater  
How do you know who want’s what? Personaly I have had “crotchboobs” hidden for as far as I remember, but I don’t mind just the nipples, as this is something less obtrusive. Tell me, how should I resolve this in my filters?
 
Also real horses don’t have flat “crotchboobs” on their bellies that consist only of visible nipples. So just nipples alone would be actually incorrect in terms of anatomy and thus  

 
would be not true if it included nipples only.

@Crusier  
Trying to change tags to adhere to your personal filters isn’t really the best policy. If everyone did that the tags would be a mess.
 
If you filter “crotchboobs”, but don’t mind the more reasonably sized “teats”, you can add to your complex filter “(crotchboobs, -teats)”, this will hide any image with the “crotchboobs” tag that doesn’t have the “teats” tag.
 
Is that sufficient?

@ArmadilloEater  
No, it is not. I need a tag combination that would left out only nipples on flat body surface, as it was in examples I provided. In those examples they are not “teats”. That’s why I’m talking about maybe coming up with new tag for only that, not necessarily changing existing ones.
 
EDIT: Visual explaination:  

Just nipples minus crotchboobs or teats?

@ArmadilloEater  
Still don’t feel that makes a lot of sense. People complain about anatomical correctness with their horsecunts, but feel okay with adding human breasts to them and then touting it as still anatomically correct. It’s just not right. D:<

@LightningBolt  

 
Yes, I though that three examples from my first post and the image from my previous post would be sufficient :)

@Crusier  
By “change tags” I meant removing them from images, but I see what you’re saying now.
 
It’s a very specific example, but I guess we could come up with a new tag for these, if only to help people with searches and filters. We have the delicious flat chest tag for flat breasts, either we create a new tag for your specific need or we use the “flat chest” tag.
 
Do you have some ideas for a tag name? “Nipple only” perhaps?
 
Edit: @LightningBolt  
Don’t make me come over there and spank you.

@ArmadilloEater  

 
Crotch area isn’t chest, but then again there are also other species that have more than two nipples and they are extending from chest to crotch.
 

 
Maybe “flat breasts” would be more universal? Because the tag “delicious flat chest” contains images such as:  
 

 
And those are like small teats, only on chest, and I would wan’t something that would apply for breast drawn only like this:  

 
Actually flat, not “almost flat, but not really because there are breasts visible, just small.

@Crusier  
“Flat breast” would just be confused with “flat chest”, it’s not precise enough. “Nipple only” implies just what you want: no breast at all, just a nipple. We’ve been also throwing around the names “feral nipple” and “flat nipple”.

@ArmadilloEater  
Nipples*

@ArmadilloEater  
I guess if “nipple only” had proper description explaining when to use it (because the tag name itself doesn’t even make it clear that it is about females), then that would be alright.

So… “nipple only” or “nipples only”? And when can I expect that the tag accompanied with a good description will be created?

@Crusier  
Just to be sure, that tag will apply only to images of “feral” looking characters, right? As in  
and  
Right? As soon as we agree on the definition and implementation we’ll add the tag and description.

@ArmadilloEater  
But is there equivalent for anthro/human ones? Wouldn’t it be good if the “nipple only” was universal? Because “delicious flat chest” contains both things like this:  

 
And like this:  

 
And even, things where there are no breasts nor nipples at all. Because reptiles don’t have breast, duh.  

 
So there are 3 different things under this one tag right now for “non-ferals”.

Male feral mammals (excluding anything primate) don’t have nipples AFAIK, so female feral drawings with nipples imply breasts (or teats). For examples with male characters with nipples, you just have to think about how nipples are viewed in society. Bare nipples on men aren’t considered nudity, but bare nipples on women are. In other words, the tagging I feel reflects our anthropocentric view of these characters.

I’d bring up the fact that the teat is actually the nipple itself, no boob necessary, but then someone would complain we’re not a dictionary.
 
But if that were the case, you’d have your size progressions  
teats tag only = crotch-positioned nipples, no breast curvature.  
teats and crotchboobs together = modest curvature (or just crotchboobs, no teats, if the teats aren’t visible)  
teats and huge crotchboobs together = Milky Way (or just huge crotchboobs, no teats, if the teats aren’t visible)  
teats and impossibly large crotchboobs = dragging on the ground (you get the idea)

@cheezedoodle  
I wouldn’t mind that, personally.

@LightningBolt
 
@cheezedoodle
 
That would require strongly changing the meaning of a tag with 3500 picture in it.

@Crusier  
Because why do things simply when we can greatly complicate things…
 
I say go forward with “nipple only” and don’t shuffle breast tags again. I’ll poke the tag boss before we spend another month waiting for a resolution.

@Crusier  
Yes I am aware.
 
@ArmadilloEater  
If breast tags weren’t so fucked up to begin with, i would never complain. >:V

@LightningBolt  
Amen to that sister. At this point best thing we can do is try to make things easier for users, I don’t think that changing stuff up drastically again and gain will be conducive to that.
 
Unless we overhaul the lot of it once and for all or something. Are you up to mass tagging thousands of pictures and trying to judge breast sizes for each of them? :D