Uploaded by deactivated549cfd
1280x1132 JPG 202 kBInterested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
No description provided.
Tags
+-SH suggestive191730 +-SH artist:cuddlehooves341 +-SH oc954859 +-SH oc only693890 +-SH oc:leon windsong19 +-SH pegasus502854 +-SH pony1617629 +-SH baby powder280 +-SH baby wipes129 +-SH blushing276989 +-SH changing mat140 +-SH colt20664 +-SH diaper17006 +-SH diaper change603 +-SH diaper fetish11263 +-SH fetish57627 +-SH male555648 +-SH non-baby in diaper12532 +-SH pacifier3363 +-SH poofy diaper5597 +-SH solo1437373 +-SH watermark24340
Loading...
Loading...
It still confuses the heck out of me that you still haven’t added [diaper] to your hidden tags list.
It still confuses the heck out of me that you still haven’t added [diaper] to your hidden tags list.
I’ve taken to asking artists whose art I particularly like to send me the raw .pngs (or even the working copy when I can swing it). Sometimes they get posted here to replace the old versions, when I feel like putting in the effort.
But… using the jpeg compression algorithm then saving the resulting image as a png won’t actually make it smaller. It will probably make the file even larger in most cases.
FurAffinity are silly.
I typically dislike diaper anything (No offense to the people who like it, just not my thing) but god damn this is adorable.
No, FA compresses .pngs that exceed a certain filesize. It’s stupid, yes.
The only conclusion is that the artist themselves saved the image in jpeg format, then re-saved that copy as a png image. There is one other png image by the same artist here, but that one doesn’t have the same errors.
I hope the artist at least kept a copy of the image in its original format, since this is a very nice bit of art (watermark aside).