@SeraphimDawn
Your assumption is correct, and I’m glad to hear that you enjoy those :)
(Bit of trivia, I had originally only commissioned three pictures, but the artist felt that the transition between 2 and 4 seemed too sudden, so he threw in 3 for free because he’s just that nice of a guy!)
@SeraphimDawn
It makes sense when the website is terrified of losing funding/sponsors for hosting cub/minor porn, and thus will generally lean on the side of playing it safe by removing borderline images, or so I’ve heard.
@remick0
but… how would THIS go against the acceptible upload policy? Furaffinity is full of pics of ponies, inflation, furries having sex, and many of the other tags in here. what in gods name would make them think of removing this?!
Lucky you have good people like him.
I’ve recently acquired a interest for Ponies riding pool toys.
>>401937
>>467580 (merged)
>>514071
>>539666
>>613540
I just find it to be a rather cute and novelty concept.
Your assumption is correct, and I’m glad to hear that you enjoy those :)
(Bit of trivia, I had originally only commissioned three pictures, but the artist felt that the transition between 2 and 4 seemed too sudden, so he threw in 3 for free because he’s just that nice of a guy!)
I Assume you commissioned these
1
2
3
4
These made my day. XD
No, but I am the one who originally commissioned this.
Hey.
You happen to be the artist, right?
Lolicon porn is banned here too.
They’re the mods. They can be as hypocritical as they like and ban you for calling them out.
It makes sense when the website is terrified of losing funding/sponsors for hosting cub/minor porn, and thus will generally lean on the side of playing it safe by removing borderline images, or so I’ve heard.
Not even Derpibooru is that harsh.
By their logic.
These
>>129728
>>653978
>>596881
>>542570
>>533697
>>528551
All NSFW.
Will all be prohibited just because of their art style. Even though they certainly aren’t under-aged. Censorship makes no sense.
“While the image may not intend to portray a minor, it does look like one in body type and as such is prohibited.”
Their response to me disputing the removal.
But this is a grown character.
If it’s the diaper they believe implies underaged fur. Why is there a ton of masturbatory diaper images on FA?
@pat-23
They removed it because “it violates Fur Affinity’s AUP in regards to child/cub porn”
Agreed. Why?!
but… how would THIS go against the acceptible upload policy? Furaffinity is full of pics of ponies, inflation, furries having sex, and many of the other tags in here. what in gods name would make them think of removing this?!
If they feel a picture goes against the Acceptable Upload Policy.