Viewing last 25 versions of post by LegatusFlagrans in topic Youtube Discussion

"[@Shirani":](/dis/youtube-discussion/post/3291458#post_3291458
)  
By that logic, we shouldn't have regulations or laws or government whatsoever. If humanity is naturally inclined to rebel against them, why should they be in place at all? If laws and rules are going to be broken anyway, what's the point in having them?
 
If there ceases to be a public acceptance of something that is clearly and intuitively wrong to the rest of the populace, it will eventually become nothing but a rarity. Will there be a short-term surge in the attention it recieves? Possibly., Bbut "short-term" is the key here.

"@Shirani":/dis/youtube-discussion/post/3291458#post_3291458
By that logic, we shouldn't have regulations or laws or government whatsoever. If humanity is naturally inclined to rebel against them, why should they be in place at all? If laws and rules are going to be broken anyway, what's the point in having them? If there ceases to be a public acceptance of something that is clearly and instuinctively wrong to the rest of the populace, it will eventually become nothing but a rarity. Will there be a short-term surge in the attention it recieves? Possibly. But "short-term" is the key here.

"@Shirani":/dis/youtube-discussion/post/3291458#post_3291458
By that logic, we shouldn't have regulations or laws or government whatsoever. If humanity is naturally inclined to rebel against them, why should they be in place at all? If laws and rules are going to be broken anyway, what's the point in having them? If there ceases to be a public acceptance of something that is clearly and instinctively wrong to the rest of the populace, it will eventually become nothing but a rarity. Will there be a short-term surge in the attention it recieves? Possibly. But "short-term" is the key here.