Background Pony #0E67
"@Background Pony #71E3":/forums/meta/topics/explanation-of-update-to-rule-0-for-consistency-and-clarity-especially-in-regards-to-racism?post_id=4896597#post_4896597
[bq="Background Pony #71E3"] "@Background Pony #0E67":/forums/meta/topics/explanation-of-update-to-rule-0-for-consistency-and-clarity-especially-in-regards-to-racism?post_id=4896588#post_4896588
No, what trivializes the ideology is swinging around its label like a hammer to strike anything that you don't like, you absolute tool; i fucking e, the boy who cried wolf. [/bq]
It's not "not liking nazism". That would be quite stupid to delete just any content you don't like. You're typically into the nihilism I talked about. You ignore that a promotion of ideologies have consequences. It's the consequences that are being fought here, it' is simply not jua matter of taste.
[spoiler]If it was a matter of taste., there would be a lot of shitty pictures to delete[/spoiler]
[bq="Background Pony #71E3"] "@Background Pony #0E67":/forums/meta/topics/explanation-of-update-to-rule-0-for-consistency-and-clarity-especially-in-regards-to-racism?post_id=4896588#post_4896588
No, what trivializes the ideology is swinging around its label like a hammer to strike anything that you don't like, you absolute tool; i fucking e, the boy who cried wolf. [/bq]
It's not "not liking nazism". That would be quite stupid to delete just any content you don't like. You're typically into the nihilism I talked about. You ignore that a promotion of ideologies have consequences. It's the consequences that are being fought here, it
[spoiler]If it was a matter of taste