rautamiekka 
[@TheGamerPainter](/forums/tagging/topics/general-tag-discussion?post_id=5305835#post_5305835)
> What's the point on no one adding ||anus|| when a male x male is doing ||anal||?
> Example on the said tag (I added the tag here: Yes NSFW warning!
> ||>>2976550p||
||`anus`|| only if you can see the ||anus|| itself, like its outlining, regardless of the activity.
In the case of the mentioned ||>>2976550s|| you can clearly see the bottom's ||anus|| formed as a ring (which is the important part: it's visible;; something similar tends to happen in humans due to how the ||anus|| works), and of course the top's is visible from such an angle+distance, but I've seen some porn on Db where the top's ||anus|| is totally missing, there's just a smooth curve in its place, so ||`anal`|| doesn't necessarily imply ||`anus`||.
> What's the point on no one adding ||anus|| when a male x male is doing ||anal||?
> Example on the said tag (I added the tag here: Yes NSFW warning!
> ||>>2976550p||
||`anus`|| only if you can see the ||anus|| itself, like its outlining, regardless of the activity.
In the case of the mentioned ||>>2976550s|| you can clearly see the bottom's ||anus|| formed as a ring (which is the important part: it's visible;; something similar tends to happen in humans due to how the ||anus|| works), and of course the top's is visible from such an angle+distance, but I've seen some porn on Db where the top's ||anus|| is totally missing, there's just a smooth curve in its place, so ||`anal`|| doesn't necessarily imply ||`anus`||.