General Tag Discussion

Someone with appropriate powers please add “pt” and “book” to >>2179189 so that it disappears from my searches. The tags are locked, so I cannot do it myself.

@JP  
Done and done. Thank you for alerting us.

@mjangelvortex  
Thank you.

@JP  
You’re welcome.

@JP  
twilight's fact book not working for your filters? Just curious.

@saby  
Nothing to do with filters, the image was just missing the “twilight sparkle (alicorn)” tag.

human on zebra action should add implication on zebra.

How about marshmelodrama implying rarity being rarity (kind of like pinkie physics already implies pinkie being pinkie)?

@Pulse Wave  
I suppose.
 
 
On a very unrelated note, I’ve been doing some work on some peril and vore image tagging lately (stuff like damsels in distress, cannibal cauldrons, or snakes hypnotizing ponies). Here’s the major tags given definitions/implications and applied thoroughly:  

I think we should alias Grogar’s bell to bewitching vell and then this tag should imply bell.

@Markiz93  
It really was Grogar’s bell, once upon a time.

monster mare
 
This tag seems to be primarily added by one person and seems rather stupid imo. Why would you gender monster pony when a majority are female already.

@LightningBolt  
If I remember correctly, that tag originally spawned on this site from the monster mare encyclopedia.
 
Considering the original concept of monster girls is ‘attractive female with animal/plant/insect/whatever parts slapped on’, I guess this is a continuation of that idea for ponies? There is a specific theme there that we might want to keep separate, though I’m inclined to merge it into monster or something if it has nothing to do with the original concept.

@Napsack  
Unfortunately the tagger who keeps adding it has no regard for what the creature is, and even tagged it on a few males mistakenly (including one of mine so that was when I first noticed) so it seems to have little definition.
 
I am fine with having it be on those images in the tag you linked as that makes sense. But with how it’s just tagged randomly on monster pony females and some traps seems a bit too much.

@LightningBolt  
I would think it fits on any monster-like mares to some degree, but it should definitely stay away from stallions.
 
If you want to restrict its use to only encyclopedia-related stuff, that works too.

@Napsack  
I just find that 'monster pony, female' is probably a suitable substitute.

@LightningBolt  
This is true, as well.

RE: Tagging images for G5.
 

 
This isn’t an actual spoiler for G5, but rather how one artist would redesign characters for it. Should this actually be tagged G5 or should it be something like stylized?

Should this be tagged as Rule 63 or not?
 
@Damaged  
I think it should still be tagged as G5 since the image is related to G5 according to the artist. If the artist didn’t mention G5, I would have suggested to not keep the tag but they did.

@mjangelvortex  
It’s a male character the artist decided to draw female. Rule 63 tag would apply, yes.

@Damaged  
I think the redesign tag is probably more appropriate (which I see it already has). Stylized is more a particular way of drawing rather than a particular character design aesthetic.

There’s a tag literally named new. The website doesn’t function properly when accessing it via an upload.
 
I’m posting this on both “tags” and “bugs” because I can’t figure out which topic this post should fit in.

@Zeb  
Okay then. I’ll tag it as that then.

Do the Russian megacollabs warrant a tag? Or just large-scale collaborations in general (ie. Derpi collab)?  

What do you say about the “giant demon alicorn cozy glow” tag?  
Although it works, I’ve seen the occasional post with people throwing names out there.