Vinyl Fluff 
"[@Naughtypony2010":](/1244763#comment_5404518
)
> [bq="Naughtypony2010"]"@aerion111":](/1244763#comment_5404235
)
> i understand you very good, they can be called anthromorphic animals. Very human like being in their world. however the word 'animal' pretty much overtakes in their look right said.
> Well we fans are something on their own and they relate to the show and are very appealed to the design
>
>
> But there is what i disagree it is not a furry series as in how you would see it in the furry fandom.
> the source of everything here is the show. without it no ocs no stories nothing. And they have character most of the time. At least a little story and not any creature randomly drawn as such with no real source or characteristics. Maybe i see it wrong but it is what i get to see.[/bq]
The definition of "furry" is an animal with anthropomorphic characteristics. We use "anthro" to describe human-like ponies here, but the term actually includes any human-like characteristics at all. This includes talking, self-awareness and more.
If it's an animal that is completely feral in design but talks? It's a furry.
If it's an animal that is completely feral in design but is self-aware and sentient? It's a furry.
This means every animal you've ever seen in any cartoon or otherwise falls under the definition unless they were completely feral and their depiction showed nothing more than what the real-life version was capable of.
That is, and always will be, the original definition of the term. Everything else afterwards is basically the individual person mentally making up their ownmpersontal crequirementseria, but none of it counts.
What the Fluff?
> [
> i understand you very good, they can be called anthromorphic animals. Very human like being in their world. however the word 'animal' pretty much overtakes in their look right said.
> Well we fans are something on their own and they relate to the show and are very appealed to the design
>
>
> But there is what i disagree it is not a furry series as in how you would see it in the furry fandom.
> the source of everything here is the show. without it no ocs no stories nothing. And they have character most of the time. At least a little story and not any creature randomly drawn as such with no real source or characteristics. Maybe i see it wrong but it is what i get to see.
The definition of "furry" is an animal with anthropomorphic characteristics. We use "anthro" to describe human-like ponies here, but the term actually includes any human-like characteristics at all. This includes talking, self-awareness and more.
If it's an animal that is completely feral in design but talks? It's a furry.
If it's an animal that is completely feral in design but is self-aware and sentient? It's a furry.
This means every animal you've ever seen in any cartoon or otherwise falls under the definition unless they were completely feral and their depiction showed nothing more than what the real-life version was capable of.
That is, and always will be, the original definition of the term. Everything else afterwards is basically the individual person mentally making up their own