Uploaded by Extazik
1000x1200 PNG 949 kB
Interested in advertising on Derpibooru? Click here for information!
Help fund the $15 daily operational cost of Derpibooru - support us financially!
Description
Inspired by a near-identical sweet ceramic gift a thoughtful friend sent me. <3 I thought Rarity might enjoy one also.
Tags
+-SH safe2181751 +-SH artist:whitediamonds496 +-SH rarity218223 +-SH pony1610209 +-SH unicorn541076 +-SH g42037854 +-SH accent287 +-SH bathrobe1749 +-SH clothes637626 +-SH cute266855 +-SH female1810820 +-SH floppy ears73294 +-SH hoof hold13065 +-SH implied applejack1074 +-SH implied lesbian4780 +-SH implied rarijack557 +-SH implied shipping7191 +-SH looking at you260834 +-SH mare746272 +-SH morning1489 +-SH morning ponies1718 +-SH mug6348 +-SH raribetes7044 +-SH robe4886 +-SH sitting92964 +-SH smiling399794 +-SH solo1432051 +-SH sugarcube229
Loading...
Loading...
I’m pretty sure she can do that, no matter what gender.
So AJ can’t have one of her friends over for tea without there being something sexual implied by that?
The only reason this image has those tags is because of the artist who drew it. I think there’s a larger discussion to be had about whether artist intent should factor into tagging decisions or not, and about how to tag things in a way which satisfies both users searching for a tag and users filtering it out, but obviously that’s a bit off-topic for the comments here.
So it’s not enough that Rarity is holding a coffee mug with AJ’s most used phrase and a little apple icon, you need AJ to be in frame for RariJack to be implied?
implied: involved, indicated, or suggested without being directly or explicitly stated; tacitly understood
Though I do think it’s kinda funny how this image is tagged “implied rarijack” even though Applejack isn’t even in the picture.
Indeed so.
It’s pretty impossible to look at whitediamonds content and not feel all warm and fuzzy inside
‘Twas my icon everywhere for the longest time~ <3