@Zerius24  
Maybe you were just spamming your opinion?

Damn. I have to stop being against violence against animals. The fluffybooru blocked my IP address and branded me as a spammer just because I expressed a negative attitude against violence. And when somebody blocks you and mark you as a spammer, it means that your opinions are wrong. Or not? Now I do not know. Is it wrong to be against violence? Everyone always says that violence is wrong, but everyone who says something against violence in public is suddenly target of slander, and often even someone beats up him.

@KirbyfanNeox  
Fluffies did not do anything. It’s a fault of the people who have put fluffies into boxes. Fluffies did not want to be imprisoned up in boxes. And boxes are not alive. Fluffies are alive.

@Background Pony  
No, it is not.

@MezzoDragon  
It’s not retaliation, it’s comedy.

@Background Pony  
Thanks for the link. It just proves the boghug genre is a pathetic attempt to retaliate against the hugbox genre.

@MezzoDragon  
http://www.fluffybooru.org/post/list/boxhug/1

@Background Pony  
Go home, background pony. You’re drunk.

@rserp8  
>Obviously, inanimate objects are more valuable, precious and “animal-like” than fluffy ponies.
 
Yes, that’s the point of the boxhug genre. It’s a shame that most of it’s not on Derpibooru.

@rserp8  
Abuse logic is backwards.

Oh, so when the fluffies get ripped to pieces, nobody bitches about it, but when boxes get torn to shreds, it’s all “OH, THE HORROR!” and “You boxkiller! Why did you murder that box?!”.
 
Obviously, inanimate objects are more valuable, precious and “animal-like” than fluffy ponies.

Is this supposed to be funny? Cuz it ain’t. And I agree with Background Pony’s comment.

Ah, fuck em!  
Boxs don’t pay taxes anyway!

IN THE AAAAAARMS OF AN ANGEL