patec 
@Background Pony #16CC
I’m just uploading a ton of sketches he did over the past year.
These are not all new art.
I’m just uploading a ton of sketches he did over the past year.
These are not all new art.
Comments
Search Results
patec
@Sumi _mlp 1213
I mean, these two already appeared in the first trailers back in.. idk.. March or something?
It really shouldn’t be a huge spoiler anymore by now that they exist.
I mean, these two already appeared in the first trailers back in.. idk.. March or something?
It really shouldn’t be a huge spoiler anymore by now that they exist.
patec
@Background Pony #B0C8
Yo, it’s not real. It’s all just fiction. That Discord/Fluttershy ship doesn’t exist either.
People can imagine and draw whatever ship they want and you’re in no position to tell them otherwise. So stop.
Also try adding some punctuation and structure to your texts. Because damn this is hard to read.
Yo, it’s not real. It’s all just fiction. That Discord/Fluttershy ship doesn’t exist either.
People can imagine and draw whatever ship they want and you’re in no position to tell them otherwise. So stop.
Also try adding some punctuation and structure to your texts. Because damn this is hard to read.
patec
@Galestorm
I mean, repeating it defeats the purpose of deleting it. So I’m not gonna do that.
I’m really sorry for all the commotion here.
@SnoopyStallion
hm.. the hide button doesn’t hide featured images.
What you can do is add the ID to your filter. If you really really need to get rid of it that badly.
I mean, repeating it defeats the purpose of deleting it. So I’m not gonna do that.
I’m really sorry for all the commotion here.
@SnoopyStallion
hm.. the hide button doesn’t hide featured images.
What you can do is add the ID to your filter. If you really really need to get rid of it that badly.
id:1427172
patec
@cloudkicker108
Ok. You’re absolutely right but please end this discussionn too now.
This comment section has been derailed enough already.
Ok. You’re absolutely right but please end this discussionn too now.
This comment section has been derailed enough already.
patec
@Cirrus Light
Here’s what irritates me right now: you’re acting like we never feature high quality digital stuff at all.
I believe we do. A lot.
But every now and then we want to have some variety too.
Is that really so god damn terrible?
Here’s what irritates me right now: you’re acting like we never feature high quality digital stuff at all.
I believe we do. A lot.
But every now and then we want to have some variety too.
Is that really so god damn terrible?
patec
@Filthy Pone
Who said anything about banning?
I mean, I can if you want. but I’m hoping we can just stop this without me having to go that far.
Who said anything about banning?
I mean, I can if you want. but I’m hoping we can just stop this without me having to go that far.
patec
Idk. Cause no one felt like it? Maybe next time?
Feature changes every 3 days. Can you really not accept that sometimes we like to mix it up a bit and don’t always wanna feature high quality digital artwork from 20 or 30 artists?
@patec
I know how it’s picked, but… why? Why was this nominated and voted instead of any of the stuff I linked? It’s not hard to find something that’s underappreciated and amazing. There’s a whole thread of users submitting those. Why not nominate from there?
Idk. Cause no one felt like it? Maybe next time?
Feature changes every 3 days. Can you really not accept that sometimes we like to mix it up a bit and don’t always wanna feature high quality digital artwork from 20 or 30 artists?
Showing results 76 - 100 of 1410 total
Default search
If you do not specify a field to search over, the search engine will search for comments with a body that is similar to the query's word stems. For example, comments containing the words winged humanization, wings, and spread wings would all be found by a search for wing, but sewing would not be.
Allowed fields
| Field Selector | Type | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
author | Literal | Matches the author of this comment. Anonymous authors will never match this term. | author:Joey |
body | Full Text | Matches the body of this comment. This is the default field. | body:test |
created_at | Date/Time Range | Matches the creation time of this comment. | created_at:2015 |
id | Numeric Range | Matches the numeric surrogate key for this comment. | id:1000000 |
image_id | Literal | Matches the numeric surrogate key for the image this comment belongs to. | image_id:1000000 |
my | Meta | my:comments matches comments you have posted if you are signed in. | my:comments |
user_id | Literal | Matches comments with the specified user_id. Anonymous users will never match this term. | user_id:211190 |