let mind wander like expressing for realizing instead of getting stalled up, reactively (like rambling and misunderstanding, potentially distortingly,) at threatening (or intrusive) implications (because “isn’t that what they’d want?” …[to have an easier time expressing predations because of insecurity regarding attention {frustratingly}{about validating <or because of> inadequacy<, potentially causing inadequacy by not realizing to be uninvolved><to be more settled and potentially reliable or present enough to be abstractly similar comparing conclusions for figuring conclusiveness(es) until exhaustiveness, exhaustion or disinterest>}])([non-exerted] plans together means something [because exertions are disruptive and disruptions are unsettling.][you don’t capture or hold people captive to learn uninvolvement.])
“nervousness (because of percieved inability[?]) endured is shameful - shamefully frustrating because of (exhaustive endeavors of or about) endured for regards (expectably or not [though don’t elaborate about percieved expectations because of validations {while and because of regarding, potentially involvedly} {oppositionally}] or expressions for {the purpose of or about} validations for and of because of relief {instead of hopelessness for enduring.})”
stocks:
the usuals of trendmaking - … buy, reduction of buying, settled higher (potentially more buying) or sell, (reduction of selling) settle (at a reasonable low, figuring reduced activity until increased buying or buying causing increased buying and maybe “fundraisers” who maintain the low point of a stock’s trend [to prevent unusual activity or to maintain a standard of trendiness],) buy…
go with the flow (as though [settle to] buy to sell with the trend based on the trend’s significant [“sales” and…] contributions [and maybe consider contributing some money to maintain it’s price usuals and profit from it {because of <noticeable> consistency <of usuals>}])
sell when they stop buying, buy when they start buying and only buy from a stock when there has been enough regular contribution to the trends of more buys to sell at a high enough price range to have made gains (by selling and avoiding potentially losing money by wishing against the trends or ticker prices.)
they’ll likely buy after the selling stops to a settle based on the buy quantity’s contributions that can be used or measured to figure potential for contributions of causing prices to rise when there is more contributions
and the prices would settle when there is not enough activity for having encouraged contributing to gaining for those potential gains, which would cause prices to lower because of the trend’s settling lows caused by less contributions to the trends
and could maybe cause prices to go even lower when and because of less likelihood of foreseeable contributions. though foreseeable contributions would mean selling activity would stop, too (which might be a good time to buy.)
basically:
when investing, buying is really the only possible gamble if you’re trying to make money regularly. sell when the prices go lower (as though “when they sell”)(to not lose [as] much money [to have more money to buy more, to find a weekly paycheck regularly.])
compare previous activity with recent activity to determine likelihood of implications of uncharted activity - (sells, settles and buys […settles, sells and settles… until more frequent activity] quantities elaborating duration as though magnitude for elevations or escalations of and because [of] activity encouraging accordingly figuring comparisons of likelihoods based on previous activity.)